And believe me, I’m with you that a Con-Con would be ideal if it had an enforcement mechanism, but I see none.
By using the misnomer “Con-Con” you reveal either your bias or your ignorance. An Article V Convention is not a “Con-Con”, it is simply a ‘meeting’ of state legislature appointed delegates.
“Con-Con” is used by Schlafly sycophants and political ‘con’ artists.
Here’s what Mark Levin has to say about a “Con-Con”:
Time 22:05
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tdZuV8JnvvA
The COS is progressing at breakneck speed regardless of Schlafly and her network of Beltway parasites. Several hundreds of state legislators at last week’s ALEC meeting are on fire with the COS Project and how it answers the rage of their constituents.
Since last December there are now 37 States with significant legislation in support of it and it’s not receding, it s growing. Right now they setting the rules and procedures for the convention meeting that are facilitated and coordinated by the COS Project. The project has already set up an organizing committee, a rules committee and an amendment proposal committee. These committees are run by seasoned legislators that are acutely aware of rules and order. There’s not going to be any “runaway” anything with these legislators.
Schlafly only cares that her little nest inside the Beltway culture is left undisturbed by the ‘crazies’ in flyover country. Too bad for her; she’s long in the tooth anyways. She needs to retire or be retired.