Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: marktwain

So, we have to destroy the village to save it. Hmm. The 1970s called, and ...


12 posted on 07/30/2015 8:25:01 PM PDT by sparklite2 (Voting is acting white.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: sparklite2

“So, we have to destroy the village to save it. Hmm.”

Nope. Sport hunting is what has saved habitat and wildlife populations all over the world, but particularily in the United States.

Sport hunting preserves animal populations, because you cannot have sport hunting without the animals to hunt.


13 posted on 07/30/2015 9:26:56 PM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: sparklite2
So, we have to destroy the village to save it. Hmm. The 1970s called, and ...
No, we have to make the village valuable in order to save it. The “village,” in this case, being a dangerous, vicious creature (from the POV not only on the wild animals it kills and eats, but also from the POV of the local people - not that anyone worries about them - and their livestock. And the only way to make a lion valuable enough is to charge $50,000 for a license to kill it - and protect the purchaser of said license politically in order to sustain your market.
This article makes the point that black bears aren’t endangerd in CA even tho they are hunted, and have about the same numbers as African lions. Least of all are chickens on the endangered species list, even though, and precisely because, we kill and eat almost all of them.

24 posted on 07/31/2015 5:53:57 AM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion ('Liberalism' is a conspiracy against the public by wire-service journalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson