Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama Gives Iran Nukes, 18 Billion Dollars – Death Sentence For Israel
Israel News Agency ^ | July 14, 2015 | Joel Leyden

Posted on 07/14/2015 7:03:00 PM PDT by IsraelBeach

By Joel Leyden
Israel News Agency

Jerusalem, Israel — July 14, 2015 … Just when one thought that the Middle East could not deteriorate any further, Obama pens an agreement with Iran.

At the time that Obama and Iran agreed that the Islamic terror state could keep their nuclear program and receive 18 billion dollars as an award, rockets from Hamas in Gaza were slamming Israel. Protestors in Iran are chanting death to America.

Let’s try to understand this.

As you read these words, Iranian backed Hamas is launching rockets at Israel and Obama is giving Iran the money to attack Israel.

Confused? One would ask: “Are Israel and the US allies? Strong allies?”

It will be several years after Obama leaves the White House that the Iranians will be permited to have nukes. But in that time, what other nations in the Middle East will be forced to acquire nuclear weapons?

Is Obama making the Middle East a safer or more dangerous place?

Sure, under his term as President it appears that he is creating a peace agreement. But that agreement is no different than Chamberlain’s appeasement agreement with Hitler. It bought a few years and then Hitler took over Europe. Millions died. Millions were gassed and burned in ovens.

The Jews of Israel are the not Jews of Europe.
One Holocaust was enough.

Iran, which threatens to wipe Israel off the map, will be addressed by Israel. Israel was not a part of these negotiations. Israel was not a part of an appeasement which threatens every Western democracy.

Obama does not get it. He can allow Iran and Islamic Jihad to threaten the US, but Jews in Israel will not, cannot accept a second Holocaust.

Obama has threatened to shoot down Israeli aircraft if they attempt to destroy Iran’s nuclear facilites.
Will that stop Israel and other states in the Middle East in preventing a nuclear Holocaust?

Is Obama declaring war on Israel, Jordan and Saudi Arabia?

Hours after the Iran nuclear and sanctions agreement was signed, Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu issued the following statement:

“The world is a much more dangerous place today than it was yesterday.

The leading international powers have bet our collective future on a deal with the foremost sponsor of international terrorism. They’ve gambled that in ten years’ time, Iran’s terrorist regime will change while removing any incentive for it to do so. In fact, the deal gives Iran every incentive not to change.

In the coming decade, the deal will reward Iran, the terrorist regime in Tehran, with hundreds of billions of dollars. This cash bonanza will fuel Iran’s terrorism worldwide, its aggression in the region and its efforts to destroy Israel, which are ongoing.”

“Amazingly, this bad deal does not require Iran to cease its aggressive behavior in any way. And just last Friday, that aggression was on display for all to see.

While the negotiators were closing the deal in Vienna, Iran’s supposedly moderate President chose to go to a rally in Tehran and at this rally, a frenzied mob burned American and Israeli flags and chanted ‘Death to America, Death to Israel!’

Now, this didn’t happen four years ago. It happened four days ago.

Iran’s Supreme Leader, the Ayatollah Khamenei, said on March 21 that the deal does not limit Iran’s aggression in any way. He said: ‘Negotiations with the United States are on the nuclear issue and on nothing else.’

And three days ago he made that clear again. ‘The United States’, he said, ‘embodies global arrogance, and the battle against it will continue unabated even after the nuclear agreement is concluded.’

Here’s what Hassan Nasrallah, the head of Iran’s terrorist proxy Hezbollah, said about sanctions relief, which is a key component of the deal. He said: ‘A rich and strong Iran will be able to stand by its allies and friends in the region more than at any time in the past.’

Translation: Iran’s support for terrorism and subversion will actually increase after the deal.

In addition to filling Iran’s terror war chest, this deal repeats the mistakes made with North Korea.

There too we were assured that inspections and verifications would prevent a rogue regime from developing nuclear weapons.

And we all know how that ended.

The bottom line of this very bad deal is exactly what Iran’s President Rouhani said today: ‘The international community is removing the sanctions and Iran is keeping its nuclear program.’

By not dismantling Iran’s nuclear program, in a decade this deal will give an unreformed, unrepentant and far richer terrorist regime the capacity to produce many nuclear bombs, in fact an entire nuclear arsenal with the means to deliver it.

What a stunning historic mistake!

Israel is not bound by this deal with Iran and Israel is not bound by this deal with Iran because Iran continues to seek our destruction.

We will always defend ourselves.”

One must ask one question after witnessing the White House sign an agreement that arms the enemies of her allies.

How can Obama defend and provide security for Israel when he turns his back on four US citizens being held hostage in Iran?


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: iran; israel; nuclear; terrorism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last
To: All

“...Obama has threatened to shoot down Israeli aircraft if they attempt to destroy Iran’s nuclear facilites...”

Is this true?????????????????

I haven’t heard this before...If this is true, he has just caused the USA to lose it’s greatest ally in that area...


21 posted on 07/14/2015 8:01:51 PM PDT by Boonie ("Nuke 'em all...Let Allah sort 'em out...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: sten

Iran’s assets have been unfrozen as a payment for them to keep negotiating.

http://www.timesofisrael.com/iranian-media-us-unfreezes-8-billion-in-assets/

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/politics/us-set-to-unblock-28bn-in-frozen-iranian-assets-as-reward-for-cooperation-9616512.html

And even the very establishment ‘Foreign Policy’ admits it’s worse than that:

http://foreignpolicy.com/2015/04/16/irans-300-billion-shakedown-sanctions-nuclear-deal/


22 posted on 07/14/2015 8:04:56 PM PDT by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: IsraelBeach

our ‘president’ has just essentially agreed to finance the rockets against Israel- and to finance iran getting a nuke- what a shameful shameful time in our history-

the ‘first ladee’ claimed for the first time in her life she was ‘proud of America’- well the reality is, for the first time many in America are ashamed of what has just happened!


23 posted on 07/14/2015 8:08:24 PM PDT by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IsraelBeach

I have not heard Valerie Jarretts name mentioned anywhere in public as the main cause for this traitourist deal.
Her influence on anything Iran has to be considered,Obama does nothing without her consent,she is an Iranian mole in the White House


24 posted on 07/14/2015 8:10:14 PM PDT by ballplayer (hvexx NKK c bmytit II iyijjhihhiyyiyiyi it iyiiy II i hi jiihi ty yhiiyihiijhijjyjiyjiiijyuiiijihyii)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IsraelBeach
Hours after the Iran nuclear and sanctions agreement was signed, Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu issued the following statement: “The world is a much more dangerous place today than it was yesterday.

And then John Kerry and an unnamed White House rep mocked Netanyahu and said "he does not know what he is talking about."

25 posted on 07/14/2015 8:20:52 PM PDT by GregoTX (Remember the Alamo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IsraelBeach

If you like your nuclear program, you can keep your nuclear program...


26 posted on 07/14/2015 8:21:29 PM PDT by Lexinom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IsraelBeach

What will it take for America to realize that their President is an enemy islamist? Or for enough Americans to even care?


27 posted on 07/14/2015 8:26:23 PM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sport
the son of a bitch does as he damn well pleases. No one in authority stands up to him. No one in authority stands up to the bastard. When it is time for him to leave the White House and he decides to stat, Congress will say o.k., The Courts will say o.k., the Military will say o.k. The media will cheer. And so he stays.

I can't beat around the bush anymore. No one stands up to him, Barky, because he's Black. Well, half-Black. Some say only 12% Black and in our society, perception and looks are everything and if you showed a picture of him to someone who does not know who he is or if you go back in time to 1955, almost everyone will say, "he's Black." Usually that in itself should not be a factor at all, you know, the content of one's character and so forth but I cannot deny what my eyes see, my ears hear and what I, along with my mother (*), and others have experienced.

So people are afraid to challenge him because they don't want to look racist by calling him out on what he does nor try to impeach him, you cannot impeach the first Black president. Simple. If you do he and his minions will cry out until they get their way and will use The Race Card to get it. They use these tactics to bully. Mom always told me that people need to stand up to bullies and have the courage to say "no." If you don't they will keep coming back for more and running your life. I resigned myself to where if I had to stand up to these bullies and do the right thing and stand up for the Constitution, if that makes me a racist, then I'm a racist. I don't care anymore. I wish I was in power somewhere, Congress, a military general, a tycoon, whatever, but I'm a nobody, but someone with some clout has to come out and call things as they are. So far Donald Trump comes closest, time will tell I guess.

We cannot let this fear stop us, those who should be speaking up kept quiet and ket things get way too far. Had we started in 2009, maybe Barkycare would not have passed among other things. If we did this in 2007/8 maybe he would not be in the white hut now. IF we did this in 2004, maybe it would have been "Barack who?"

(*) - My parents divorced in 1976, Mom needed to get a better job to support us. I was 9, almost 10 at the time. She went to an interview for the Port Authority of Pittsburgh, the mass transit system. She was happy for the interview and full of hope. She came home hoopin' mad, having kittens and spitting nickels. I asked, 'why?" She replied, "the interviewer said that she would hire me but she had to hold the position for a colored woman," I said to her, "that is wrong." Ever since then, when affirmative action came up, she would get angry, real angry and even me too as well. When Barky was selected as the first affirmative action president, I saw 70 years of anger in Mom's eyes swell up and I know the feeling since I felt 42 years of it in me. She passed in 2013, I miss her so much. Her wish was not to die with Barky in office, well, she lost that one. B-( If she was here now, she'd by even angrier with this Iran stuff and what has happened in the almost two years after her death. Maybe she was not "long for the world," she always said, "I wish we were back in the world of Andy Williams," but still, I wish she was here just to share things with and to help each other cope with this traitor in office.
28 posted on 07/14/2015 9:00:49 PM PDT by Nowhere Man ("I wish we were back in the world of Andy Williams." - My mother, 1938-2013, RIP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Tzimisce

I’m part Jew myself. I have one coworker where she said that “No good Jew would vote Republican.” Well, let’s put it this way, the Donkey Party sold them down the river again and again. Well, IIRC, FDR, the hero, sold 1000+ of them down the river when he refused to let the ship, The St. Louis, come top America with her refugees. At least those people could have been saved, I know it is a drop in the bucket but it would have been the right thing to do. I’ll put it this way, no sane Jew, or anyone, would vote Democrat.


29 posted on 07/14/2015 9:05:15 PM PDT by Nowhere Man ("I wish we were back in the world of Andy Williams." - My mother, 1938-2013, RIP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: IsraelBeach

that probably doesn’t include the promised 13 tons of gold @ 32.4 million a ton.


30 posted on 07/14/2015 9:06:20 PM PDT by stylin19a (obama = Fredo Smart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IsraelBeach
This is about to get very interesting...


31 posted on 07/14/2015 9:08:08 PM PDT by 444Flyer (How long O LORD?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fatnotlazy

The vast majority of our military personnel are neither weenies or queers. You do them a disservice by spouting such nonsense.


32 posted on 07/15/2015 1:55:09 AM PDT by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: EEGator
Friend, I didn't mean that as disrespect. But you should know that the Obama administration is on a mission to “fundamentally change” America and part of that plan is to weaken our military and change its mission. Our military is incapable of fighting in a war or defending this country. What it can do, however, is serve the purposes of the regime. That would include attacking any of our citizens deemed “enemies of the state.”

I wish it weren't so. I love and respect our men and women in uniform. But like everything else Obama has touched, the military is not what it used to be. And that's a bad thing.

33 posted on 07/15/2015 3:14:30 AM PDT by fatnotlazy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: sport
When it is time for him to leave the White House and he decides to stat, Congress will say o.k., The Courts will say o.k., the Military will say o.k. The media will cheer. And so he stays.

That will never happen, and you know it.

34 posted on 07/15/2015 5:19:58 AM PDT by Go Gordon (Barack McGreevey Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Boonie; IsraelBeach
“...Obama has threatened to shoot down Israeli aircraft if they attempt to destroy Iran’s nuclear facilites...”

I am also interested in finding out if it is true. I don't doubt that Obama could do that (just yesterday I said I wouldn't be surprised if Obama defended Iran from Israel), and we are living in bizzaro world, but has he actually said that?

35 posted on 07/15/2015 5:54:11 AM PDT by spetznaz (Nuclear-tipped Ballistic Missiles: The Ultimate Phallic Symbol)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Nowhere Man

Even Harry Truman gave the offer to a similar number of refugees from Europe with Ruth Gruber to stay in the United States after they came and stayed in a refugee camp, and Truman watched film footage sent back by the army about what they found in Dachau and Buchenwald. But still, the more I have come to learn about FDR, the more I have learned that he wasn’t that nice of a guy.


36 posted on 07/15/2015 7:45:58 AM PDT by Morpheus2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Tzimisce

I am not so sure that fallout shelters would make much of a difference for the millions of Israelis cramped into such a small country. Given the relatively short distance from Iran to Israel, it would mean hardly any warning time of incoming short-range Iranian missiles.

We in the United States get the generosity of incoming missiles giving us a few minutes’ warning as they have to cross thousands of miles over the Pacific or Atlantic Ocean. Israel, not at all, in fact, I am hardly sure there would be a few seconds. Also, what kind of idiot(s) thinks Israel would have the warning window of the U.S. of 15-20 minutes for an Iranian missile? I would like to show them a globe and how idiotic they are for thinking that idea.


37 posted on 07/15/2015 7:50:49 AM PDT by Morpheus2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: The Antiyuppie

Depends how much time to launch, also put in mind it takes a small fraction of a time for a short-range missile from Iran to hit Israel as opposed to a Russian missile travelling the many thousands of miles to hit a U.S. target. If Iran ever does launch a missile, Israel likely won’t even have time to react or launch any of their own.


38 posted on 07/15/2015 7:53:13 AM PDT by Morpheus2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: IsraelBeach

bttt


39 posted on 07/15/2015 11:52:30 AM PDT by Pagey (HELL is The 2nd Term of a POTUS who is a TRUE DIVIDER of humans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morpheus2009

Ever hear of The 4 Minute Warning? It is called that in the UK because it would take about 4 minutes for a Soviet or Russian MRBM or IRBM to reach the UK from Russian. Even so with SLBMS from subs, it will be down to 30 seconds to about a minute. Iran to Israel could be that short, if lucky, maybe 2 minutes tops.


40 posted on 07/15/2015 12:07:55 PM PDT by Nowhere Man ("I wish we were back in the world of Andy Williams." - My mother, 1938-2013, RIP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson