Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: DeoVindiceSicSemperTyrannis
The colonials didn't call it secession - they called it rebellion.

“Our cruel and unrelenting Enemy leaves us no choice but a brave resistance, or the most abject submission; this is all we can expect - We have therefore to resolve to conquer or die: Our own Country's Honor, all call upon us for a vigorous and manly exertion, and if we now shamefully fail, we shall become infamous to the whole world. Let us therefore rely upon the goodness of the Cause, and the aid of the supreme Being, in whose hands Victory is, to animate and encourage us to great and noble Actions - The Eyes of all our Countrymen are now upon us, and we shall have their blessings, and praises, if happily we are the instruments of saving them from the Tyranny meditated against them. Let us therefore animate and encourage each other, and shew the whole world, that a Freeman contending for Liberty on his own ground is superior to any slavish mercenary on earth.” ― George Washington

383 posted on 07/15/2015 5:08:54 PM PDT by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 382 | View Replies ]


To: rockrr
As I said, many did call it rebellion because that was what Britain called it (although I'm not seeing it used in that quote you gave). And in a way it was a rebellion against tyranny and British oppression. However, since they also declared themselves to be free and independent it was also secession. Please please please re-read the definition of secession again. I think you missed it.
393 posted on 07/16/2015 10:38:35 AM PDT by DeoVindiceSicSemperTyrannis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 383 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson