Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Elderberry

Caught in just one lie?


4 posted on 06/18/2015 12:04:12 PM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: sport

>>> Caught in just one lie? <<<

Gotta start somewhere!


6 posted on 06/18/2015 12:05:37 PM PDT by JJ_Folderol (Diagonally parked in a parallel universe...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: sport

A never ending one.


7 posted on 06/18/2015 12:05:45 PM PDT by Elderberry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: sport
Caught in just one lie?

I counted three:

  1. Waco Police Detective Sam Key at 11:06 a.m. on June 12, 2015, contain an admission that police bullets did, in fact, strike “multiple” motorcycle club members. This is despite the fact that Waco Police Chief Brent Stroman, in a press conference held two hours later on the same day, told reporters that it was “undetermined” whether police fire struck any bikers and that the issue “was still under investigation.”

  2. Broden also pointed out that the Key swore that police “were fired upon by Bandidos and/or Cossacks” but at Stroman’s press conference Stroman specifically stated that he “could not say” and “w[ould] not say” that Bandidos and/or Cossacks “fired upon the officers.”

  3. Broden explained that he had asked police for the return of his client’s mobile phone during a phone conversation with a Waco police detective on May 28, 2015 but was told that, at the time, the phone was being searched pursuant to a search warrant. Nevertheless, he has now learned that the warrant for Mr. Clendennen’s mobile phone was not obtained until June 12, 2015. “I was lied to by the Waco police,” said Broden. Broden did say, however, that Mr. Clendennen willingly provided police with the password to access his mobile phone once he learned of the search warrant yesterday.

There's also an interesting reference to a US Supreme Court decision:

In the 1979 Ybarra [.v Illinois] decision, the Supreme Court announced: “Where the standard is probable cause, a search or seizure of a person must be supported by probable cause particularized with respect to that person. This requirement cannot be undercut or avoided by simply pointing to the fact that coincidentally there exists probable cause to search or seize another or to search the premises where the person may happen to be.”

10 posted on 06/18/2015 12:09:52 PM PDT by justlurking (tagline removed, as demanded by Admin Moderators)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: sport

“Caught in just one lie?”

Yeah well it’s the same lie told over 100 times. Texas State Authorities need to take over this “investigation” from Whacko and the county sheriff. They’re in the process of trying to cover up multiple murders under color of authority.


11 posted on 06/18/2015 12:10:59 PM PDT by vette6387
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson