Skip to comments.
Could a heavy object cause a train derailment?
Duke C.
Posted on 05/16/2015 3:52:39 PM PDT by Duke C.
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-85 next last
To: EEGator
21
posted on
05/16/2015 4:14:58 PM PDT
by
Chainmail
(A simple rule of life: if you can be blamed, you're responsible.)
To: Talisker
According to wiki the individual axle rating on an amtrak locomotive is 72,000 lbs., and I think it's safe to assume that the loco windshields have bulletproofing.
So neither the windshield nor the bowling ball would shatter, but bounce off after causing considerable damage to the windshield.
Just playing devil's advocate.
22
posted on
05/16/2015 4:15:46 PM PDT
by
Duke C.
To: Duke C.
You better go relearn some basic physics. F does not equal MV-squared.
To: Talisker
Train physics, Its all about the go-mentum.
24
posted on
05/16/2015 4:17:01 PM PDT
by
cripplecreek
("For by wise guidance you can wage your war")
To: 9thLife
“Why do you want to square v?”
kinetic energy
E = (mv**2)/2
70 mph is just over 102 ft/sec, not 88 ft/sec
bowling ball mass of 15 pounds equates to 0.466 slugs (pounds are a unit of force, not mass)
gives us about 2425 foot-pounds of energy. So the analogy of a BB hitting an auto is not too far off.
Much about a collision result depends on the materials of the colliding objects, their angle of impact, their shape, etc. Momentum is a factor: the scalar product of mass and velocity.
To carry on with the analogy, a human struck by that 15-pound bowling ball traveling 70 mph (102 ft/sec) will sustain injuries quite different from a human struck by - say - a 30 cal bullet traveling 2700 ft/sec (common impact velocity fired from many hunting rifles), though the kinetic energy of the projectiles are nearly identical.
To: tennmountainman; Duke C.
>> going 106 MPH into a 50 MPH curve.
Then he slammed on the brakes.
26
posted on
05/16/2015 4:21:41 PM PDT
by
george76
(Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
To: Duke C.
There is no debate. 106 MPH says it all. A train runs on a track. It’s not like you have to keep in a lane like a car. He was distracted or dozed off and missed a warning.
To: Duke C.
Let's say a thug tosses a bowling ball at Amtrak 188, presently moving at 70 MPH. That would be 15LBS times 88FPS which would equal 1,742,000 foot pounds of energy. The ball's kinetic energy would be
0.5*15*(70*5280/3600)**2 = 79,053.3 foot-pounds
or about 0.0298 kilowatt-hours.
28
posted on
05/16/2015 4:22:15 PM PDT
by
cynwoody
To: schurmann
Thanks for that.
We know from recent news that a train hitting an SUV can derail -- I was surprised to learn that. I have also arrived on a scene where a freight train passed through a semi trailer only minutes before - no derail; I suppose because it was a perfect broadside.
The smell of Kraft jelly and bar-b-cue sauce was heavy in the air, though -- that being the cargo in the trailer.
29
posted on
05/16/2015 4:24:13 PM PDT
by
9thLife
("Life is a military endeavor..." -- Francis)
To: MIchaelTArchangel
Thanks for your reply. The train was traveling at 70 MPH (88FPS) not the bowling ball. What would be the correct equation?
30
posted on
05/16/2015 4:25:19 PM PDT
by
Duke C.
To: Duke C.
A car weighs a hell of a lot more than a bowling ball and would very rarely, if ever, derail a train. What derails trains is excessive speed in a turn for the bank angle, or problems with the rail. Loose rail, gap, foreign object attached to it, etc.
31
posted on
05/16/2015 4:25:48 PM PDT
by
Still Thinking
(Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
To: cripplecreek
32
posted on
05/16/2015 4:29:00 PM PDT
by
9thLife
("Life is a military endeavor..." -- Francis)
To: jacquej
The expert is bogus. There is no way a surprised jerk movement could instantly take a train from 50 to 100 mph that quickly. Or reduce speed from100 to 50 that quickly either.
33
posted on
05/16/2015 4:30:00 PM PDT
by
Secret Agent Man
(Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
To: Paladin2
A derailer attached to the track can do the job easily.Shhh! I wasn't going to tell them about those!
34
posted on
05/16/2015 4:30:32 PM PDT
by
Still Thinking
(Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
To: 9thLife
35
posted on
05/16/2015 4:30:55 PM PDT
by
cripplecreek
("For by wise guidance you can wage your war")
To: cripplecreek
Even at low speed, once a train starts crashing, it keeps crashing till its done.
Why do I get the feeling the occupation media believes this guy sat around all day with apples hitting him in the head and nothing else?
We are devolving as a species.
36
posted on
05/16/2015 4:32:24 PM PDT
by
PA Engineer
(Liberate America from the Occupation Media.)
To: Duke C.
F=MV\2 = republican’s fault
To: Duke C.; All
Oh, well. Might as well get some rock on.
You're welcome!
38
posted on
05/16/2015 4:32:50 PM PDT
by
9thLife
("Life is a military endeavor..." -- Francis)
To: Still Thinking
Derailers look kinda heavy.
39
posted on
05/16/2015 4:34:02 PM PDT
by
Paladin2
To: Talisker
Steal frames would seem to be a ‘hood thang.
40
posted on
05/16/2015 4:35:52 PM PDT
by
Paladin2
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-85 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson