Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Yes, birthers, Ted Cruz IS a natural-born citizen of the U.S.
Lone Star Conservative ^ | Thursday, May 14, 2015 at 10:30 AM | Josh Painter

Posted on 05/14/2015 8:44:18 AM PDT by Josh Painter

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221-240 next last
To: NOVACPA
The Arab-Kenyan Barack Hussein Obama II, (a.k.a. Barry Soetoro), ( the one guilty of TREASON ! ) has NO legitimate Social Security Number.
His father was NOT an immigrant to the United States. Barack Obama Sr. was a "Transient Alien" because he did NOT intend on residing in the United States permanently.
Barack Obama Sr. was a dual citizen of Great Britain and Kenya, and NEVER a United States Citizen.His mother could NOT impart U.S. citizen to her son, Barack Obama II, because she did NOT meet the legal requirements to do so,
at the time her son was born IN the Coast Provincial General Hospital, MOMBASA, KENYA at 7:21 pm on August 4, 1961.
Democrats knew this and tried to eliminate the "Natural Born Citizen" requirement at least 8 times BEFORE Obama won his election in 2008.

Obama is NOT a United States Citizen, and is NOT a LEGAL IMMIGRANT.
He has no VISA allowing him into this country.
Barack Hussein Obama II IS ILLEGAL !
He should be IMPEACHED IMMEDIATELY, tried for TREASON, SENTENCED to death, and then have his body deported back to Kenya.

Here are some articles to assist in defining "WHO" and "WHAT" Obama IS.
But I disagree. No.
Free Republic has covered this issue before.
Read this:
CORRECTION: Barack Obama, the first black Arab-American -Kenyan pResident of the United States.



Read Why did Youtube pull this video about Barack Obama?
and watch BREAKING NEWS! - Is Barack Obama Really A Saudi / Muslim "Plant" in the White House?.
181 posted on 05/17/2015 4:27:09 AM PDT by Yosemitest (It's Simple ! Fight, ... or Die !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: Nero Germanicus

“And additionally in 2009, the House of Representatives passed a resolution (H. Res. 593, 111th Congress) by a vote of 378-0 which states, in part, “Whereas the 44th President of the United States, Barack Obama was born in Hawaii on August 4, 1961.”

Such passage carries the same legal weight as if the same group of 378 had passed a resolution to declare the 3rd Friday in June, National Pickle Day, or some nonsense similarly situated.


182 posted on 05/17/2015 4:50:40 AM PDT by NOVACPA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: NOVACPA

You are correct that a simple non-binding resolution passed by either chamber of Congress carries no legal weight. However that “whereas clause” in House Resolution 593 has carried POLITICAL weight in the House of Representatives. Consequently since the adoption of that resolution, the political effect is that there has never been a congressional hearing or even a speech in the House on Obama’s eligibility/ineligibility as a natural born citizen.
Senate Resolution 511 on John McCain’s Panama Canal Zone birth and his natural born citizenship had the same effect.
I expect similar resolutions will be passed concerning Senator Cruz’s birth in Canada and his status as a natural born citizenship.


183 posted on 05/17/2015 6:54:24 AM PDT by Nero Germanicus (PALIN/CRUZ: 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: Godebert
Ya, who cares about the rule of law?

Caring has to have limits.

To me, this is about far more than just the rule of law, which is currently used selectively by the lawless. This is the second half of a successful assault upon the Constitution, our definitions of citizenship and our national identity, while undermining and using our integrity against us creating a slow motion suicide.

The solution the self-described Constitutionalists reach for is the easy way and will do irreparable damage, just like the one the other side reached for did even though both men are ideological opposites in every way.

As such, their solution comes with too high of a price in order to temporarily win a few battles only to lose the greater war. But, since there is nothing that can be said or done now to alter the path we're on, caring has to have limits.

184 posted on 05/17/2015 7:50:04 AM PDT by GBA (Just a hick in paradise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: Yosemitest

http://www.npr.org/sections/itsallpolitics/2013/06/20/193585553/how-ted-cruzs-father-shaped-his-views-on-immigration

Above is the link for the story about Ted’s dad coming to the U.S. on a 4 year student visa, getting asylum when it was up, having a green card, then marrying Ted’s mom, and them moving to Canada thereafter.


185 posted on 05/17/2015 2:54:33 PM PDT by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57, returning after lurking since 2000)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: Yosemitest

http://www.arcadeathome.com/archive.phtml?2008-03

above is the link for the % arabic & % african for 0’s dad.

(clicking on the link at the top of the article gets one here:

http://www.arcadeathome.com/gate.phtml?http://www.diversityinc.com/public/1461.cfm

But it is not there... “error 404 - nothing found”)


186 posted on 05/17/2015 3:21:15 PM PDT by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57, returning after lurking since 2000)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: WildHighlander57

That’s the same source I use in the comment that you responded to.


187 posted on 05/17/2015 10:52:35 PM PDT by Yosemitest (It's Simple ! Fight, ... or Die !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: WildHighlander57
I HATE IT WHEN THAT HAPPENS !
Try these: That should be enough to get you started.
188 posted on 05/17/2015 11:10:09 PM PDT by Yosemitest (It's Simple ! Fight, ... or Die !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: Yosemitest

Many thanks for gathering all those links; somehow I missed the part about him getting asylum and a green card in your link labeled “source”, so I went looking and found and posted the link with the original name...


189 posted on 05/17/2015 11:10:22 PM PDT by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57, returning after lurking since 2000)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: Yosemitest

Bingo! Those links have the info :)


190 posted on 05/17/2015 11:15:23 PM PDT by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57, returning after lurking since 2000)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: WildHighlander57
Just in case you have NOT read it before.

Read
Here's you some more sources and FACTS.

People can go to www.scribd.com and read their pages 20 thru 32 ,


For those of you who don't know, remember this:
8 Congressional attempts from June 2004 to February 2008 to alter Article II Section 1 Clause 5 of the US Constitution, proves to meRead it for yourself.
Then look at these links.
Just before the 2008 election Barack Obama's election team spent $1.4 million blocking access to all of Obama's records.

Barack Hussein Obama II is UNCONSTITUTIONALLY QUALIFIED.
There were 8 attempts by Democrats to try to "Change the Qualification Rules" BEFORE Obama was elected.
They KNOW Obama's ILLEGAL ... AND .... UNQUALIFIED!

Obama's record is hard to find.
Think about this.
Here's something to ponder. Now think about those facts,and statements.
The forgeries I'm aware of, are the three Birth Cretificate Barack Hussein Obama II has forged.
I don't trust evidence put forth by Obama supporters.
The disappearance of too much evidence on Obama is strong enough for me to know that he was born in Kenya.

Read INS DOC FOUND: U.S. CERTIFICATE ISSUED TO ONE EAST AFRICAN-BORN CHILD OF U.S. CITIZEN IN 1961!
The documents provided in that article are very damaging to Obama, and well worth your time.

Most of these early "supporters" of the ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT IN CHIEF were party to the Communists "spooks".
There's a great volume of history you have to go through to understand this, and it goes back to about 1850.

Read these three articles on one of my earlier post:


Now go back and read The Communist Takeover Of America - 45 Declared Goals.

Are you getting the depth of this Fabian Society takeover?
It's deep, it's ugly, and most people WILL NOT ... CAN NOT ... accept the truth.

191 posted on 05/18/2015 12:09:12 AM PDT by Yosemitest (It's Simple ! Fight, ... or Die !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: Yosemitest
You know, you really should GET THE FACTS BEFORE you reveal your IGNORANCE !

The information at your link is statutory man-made law regarding Citizenship.

positive law

n. statutory man-made law, as compared to "natural law," which is purportedly based on universally accepted moral principles, "God's law," and/or derived from nature and reason. The term "positive law" was first used by Thomas Hobbes in Leviathan (1651).

natural law

the body of laws derived from nature and reason, embodied in the Declaration of Independence assertion that "all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their creator with certain inalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of happiness." 3) the opposite of "positive law," which is created by mankind through the state.

192 posted on 05/18/2015 3:19:59 AM PDT by Godebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: Godebert
And your point IS ?

193 posted on 05/18/2015 3:22:00 AM PDT by Yosemitest (It's Simple ! Fight, ... or Die !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: Yosemitest
The point being that the term 'natural born Citizen' found in our Constitution is derived from natural law, NOT positive law. No law made by man can change that definition.

The Law of Nations or the Principles of Natural Law (1758)

The Laws of Nature and of Nature's God: The True Foundation of American Law

Publications of the Colonial Society of Massachusetts, Volume 20 - Use of The Law of Nations by the Constitutional Convention

194 posted on 05/18/2015 4:07:33 AM PDT by Godebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies]

To: Godebert
Hey DUMMY !
Have you NOT READ Article 1 (The Legislative Branch) Section 8 (Powers of Congress) of the U.S. Constitution ? Did you forget about Amendment 14 (Citizenship Rights) WHICH IS PART OF THE CONSTITUTION and just as germane ?

You'd like to IGNORE THAT, would't you ! ?
But you can NOT !
195 posted on 05/18/2015 4:34:34 AM PDT by Yosemitest (It's Simple ! Fight, ... or Die !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies]

To: Yosemitest

Article 1, Section 8 only grants congress the power to establish a uniform rule of naturalization. Read it.


196 posted on 05/18/2015 5:35:23 AM PDT by Godebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: Yosemitest
The Supreme Court of the United States has never applied the term “natural born citizen” to any other category than “those born in the country of parents who are citizens thereof”.

Citizenship Terms Used in the U.S. Constitution - The 5 Terms Defined & Some Legal Reference to Same

197 posted on 05/18/2015 5:44:39 AM PDT by Godebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: Godebert
I did, and YOU DID NOT READ THE LINE I QUOTED.

So AGAIN, you're WRONG !
198 posted on 05/18/2015 5:55:45 AM PDT by Yosemitest (It's Simple ! Fight, ... or Die !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies]

To: Godebert
You really need to go back to school.
You're comprehension is CRAP !

Amendment 14 (Citizenship Rights) IS PART OF THE CONSTITUTION and IS JUST AS GERMANE !
199 posted on 05/18/2015 5:58:59 AM PDT by Yosemitest (It's Simple ! Fight, ... or Die !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies]

To: Yosemitest
In defining what an Article II “natural born Citizen” is, we do not seek to read into the Constitution that which was not intended and written there by the Framers. Despite popular belief, the Fourteenth Amendment does not convey the status of “natural born Citizen” in its text nor in its intent. Some add an implication to the actual wording of the Fourteenth Amendment by equating the amendment’s “citizen” to Article II’s “natural born Citizen.” But nowhere does the 14th Amendment confer “natural born citizen” status. The words simply do not appear there, but some would have us believe they are implied. But the wording of the Amendment is clear in showing that it confers citizenship only and nothing more.

Neither the 14th Amendment nor Wong Kim Ark make one a Natural Born Citizen

200 posted on 05/18/2015 6:58:53 AM PDT by Godebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221-240 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson