No, it was directed specifically at you and your contention that you would vote for Cruz even if he was a proven illegal alien and was not eligible to run under the Constitution. You either believe in the Rule of Law or you don't.
So, *YOU* know better than Ted Cruz as to the constitutionality of *anything*? The same Ted Cruz described by his Constitutional Law Professors as off the charts brilliant? You expect anyone here to believe *YOU* know the Constitution better than Cruz does? Thats laughable!!
LOL. You are a bloomin' idiot. I can read and comprehend what the Constitution specifies as to the eligibility to be President of the United States. It really isn't rocket science or something that requires a constitutional scholar to determine.
Ill give you one more chance to prove that just because everyone doesnt want to play your silly lib-tard game, that does not give you standing to be such an unprovoked jerk. So if I do not reply to you further, then guess what it is because you are still demonstrating (for everyone to see) that you are still being a lib-tard, concern-troll jerk. Why dont you head on back over to huffingtonpost or whatever liberaltopia rock you crawled out from under and let them know that your pathetic attempt at a concern-troll post against the best conservative running didnt work out like you thought it would. Bub-Bye sunshine!
When you can't engage in civil discourse to discuss substantive issues, your only fallback is ad hominem attacks. Grow up and get better informed.
Oh, like when you started slinging unfounded accusations, Capt Hyperbole? Pot, Meet Kettle! You started it sunshine. I just righteously spanked you in public for it and now you're all butt-hurt. Cry me a river.
"...You either believe in the Rule of Law or you don't..."
As a constitutional lawyer who has argued before the supreme court and was described by his professors as "off the charts brilliant" do you think Cruz would be running if he were not eligible? Do you think Cruz would be running if he were an illegal alien (a hypothetical, ridiculous example given to show how idiotic your concern-troll premise is)? A concern troll will answer that question with a hedge like, "I don't know". Someone being intellectually honest only needs a "Yes" or a "No".
"...I can read and comprehend what the Constitution specifies as to the eligibility to be President of the United States..."
No, you can't. You have yet to demonstrate even a basic level of understanding of what you read, even here with simple comments in plain language. Until you do, your patently ridiculous opinions can and should be safely disregarded. Until you can produce a court defensible precedent that shows Cruz is ineligible; Until you can show that Cruz was incorrectly deemed a Natural Citizen (because he was *not* "naturalized", ergo, he's a "Natural" citizen); then your premise has no merit. At all. It's a non-starter. All you have proven yourself to be is a common, garden-variety "concern-troll" who can't even back up his laughable premise at the slightest hint of objection.
You should probably crawl back under whatever slimy huffingtonpost rock you lib-tard nuts live under. Spank you very much.