Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: ansel12

It’s is a largely localized issue. If you kick of an EMP over Kansas, it will probably only damage a few things directly under the blast. That’s what the Russians discovered when they actually did it.
I have read that if terrorists take out about 5 transformer stations, they could black out most of California.


41 posted on 04/20/2015 10:48:08 AM PDT by AppyPappy (If you are not part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


To: AppyPappy

Nukes by themselves make for poor emps. It’s when you undertake to create a huge inductance coil and a massive capacitor and saturate it with enough instantaneous energy to make the system go “snap” when you set off a high energy explosive full of charged particles that you might have something workable. The weight of such a system to create a continent wide crippler makes it impractical to launch. This is not to say emp’s couldn’t be employed in key areas to cause a large amount of damage and we should be hardening our systems. A potential solar event CME event for example, by itself should’ve been enough of a reason to have hardened our systems decades ago!


185 posted on 04/23/2015 4:43:38 AM PDT by mdmathis6 (If Hitler, Nazi, OR...McCarthy are mentioned in an argument, then the argument is over!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson