Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Absent Lesser Charges Than Murder, Officer Michael Slager Will Go Free
ClashDaily.com ^ | 4/17/15 | Donald Joy

Posted on 04/17/2015 10:33:50 AM PDT by IChing

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-106 next last
For those who don't already know, the South Carolina Supreme Court has seen fit to designate a black judge -- who is a noted civil rights activist -- to preside over this case.

Do you think Slager will get a fair trial?

1 posted on 04/17/2015 10:33:50 AM PDT by IChing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: IChing

Go lick a boot.


2 posted on 04/17/2015 10:39:02 AM PDT by Fido969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IChing

What is the back story on the guy the cop killed? What led up to all of this?


3 posted on 04/17/2015 10:43:12 AM PDT by Jack Hydrazine (Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; We need a second party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IChing
Do you think Slager will get a fair trial?

No. But he looks guilty at this point.

4 posted on 04/17/2015 10:45:33 AM PDT by MileHi (Liberalism is an ideology of parasites, hypocrites, grievance mongers, victims, and control freaks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fido969

We’ll said...


5 posted on 04/17/2015 10:50:03 AM PDT by lordpumblechook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MileHi

Guilty of what, in your opinion? And did you happen to read the analysis?


6 posted on 04/17/2015 10:53:00 AM PDT by IChing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: IChing

“This has been applied to the law enforcement setting where a police officer, after being in physical combat, is justified in using deadly force but then the circumstances change in front of him. An officer may neurologically be unable to stop firing until either the suspect is down or several seconds elapse.”


I have serious doubts this defense would ever be accepted if a regular citizen tried to raise it.


7 posted on 04/17/2015 10:55:08 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IChing

Shooting someone in the back is murder and then covering it up by planting evidence near the body speaks to Slager’s state of mind: meaning that he knew as he fired the shots that he was doing something wrong and that it needed to be covered up with a lie.

He may not get the death penalty but I certainly hope he gets jailyard justice.


8 posted on 04/17/2015 10:55:18 AM PDT by MeganC (You can ignore reality, but reality won't ignore you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine

Cop stopped him for an inoperative tail light, he found a warrant for unpaid child support, and the guy tried to run.


9 posted on 04/17/2015 10:56:15 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman

Who said it was a defense? Read the analysis.


10 posted on 04/17/2015 10:57:47 AM PDT by IChing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman

> Cop stopped him for an inoperative tail light, he found a
> warrant for unpaid child support, and the guy tried to run.

Definitely not a reason to shoot him in the back.

He could have been picked up at a later time, probably without incident, as he was not a violent offender.


11 posted on 04/17/2015 10:58:17 AM PDT by Westbrook (Children do not divide your love, they multiply it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: IChing

With Scott lumbering away, the taser darts simply make it a possible revenge killing without removing the possibility that it was simply opportunistic.


12 posted on 04/17/2015 10:58:39 AM PDT by arthurus (it's true!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman

And, further, Graham v. Connor makes it clear that such cases are NOT to be tried the same as those involving regular citizens.


13 posted on 04/17/2015 10:58:49 AM PDT by IChing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MeganC

Death penalty has been ruled out.

So in your opinion it’s murder or nothing?


14 posted on 04/17/2015 11:00:02 AM PDT by IChing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: IChing

I thought your last analysis was definitive?


15 posted on 04/17/2015 11:02:28 AM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman

Guess the childs mother won’t be getting that child support payment now.


16 posted on 04/17/2015 11:03:59 AM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: IChing

Yeah, I read it.

I don’t think this was premeditated, more like manslaughter.

I’ll tell you what I do know. No matter what the circumstances, if I shot someone in the back, I’d never be free again. I don’t hold cops to lesser standard than they want to hold me to.


17 posted on 04/17/2015 11:06:21 AM PDT by MileHi (Liberalism is an ideology of parasites, hypocrites, grievance mongers, victims, and control freaks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MileHi

Okay, so what about the overcharge? Can you see how he walks if they fail to allow jurors the option to convict on a lesser charge?


18 posted on 04/17/2015 11:14:42 AM PDT by IChing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

It was, for the specific charge of murder. How did you miss that?


19 posted on 04/17/2015 11:16:18 AM PDT by IChing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: IChing

He MAY get a fair trial, but only with a change of venue. I also believe he is NOT guilty of murder, but may be of manslaughter.


20 posted on 04/17/2015 11:16:59 AM PDT by 2harddrive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-106 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson