To: SampleMan
Can someone tell me why they haven’t built underground pipes across the U.S. to carry water from the states that are experiencing flooding/ high water levels to the states that are in a drought? I can see no environmental hazards that the environmentalists would be concerned about?
5 posted on
04/06/2015 4:05:26 AM PDT by
lilypad
To: lilypad
Can someone tell me why they haven’t built underground pipes across the U.S. to carry water from the states that are experiencing flooding/ high water levels to the states that are in a drought? I can see no environmental hazards that the environmentalists would be concerned about?
Flooding is generally a very localized and short term problem. Drought is a long term widespread problem.
8 posted on
04/06/2015 4:13:42 AM PDT by
cripplecreek
("For by wise guidance you can wage your war")
To: lilypad
You would spend hundreds of billions of dollars and it would take years to complete a pipeline that would have no use after the drought ended.
24 posted on
04/06/2015 5:29:40 AM PDT by
IMR 4350
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson