Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Feminist Mag: Like Breasts? Then You're a Sexist
Pundit Press ^ | 4/5/15 | Aurelius

Posted on 04/05/2015 5:08:30 PM PDT by rightistight

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-174 last
To: ChildOfThe60s
Kris Nelson is a trans, queer, neurodivergent witch trying to make their way in LA

Trying to make "their" way... sigh.

Stephen Lynch - Voices in My Head
161 posted on 04/06/2015 11:01:22 AM PDT by Svartalfiar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: rightistight; Slings and Arrows
You Can Touch My Boobies
162 posted on 04/06/2015 11:45:00 PM PDT by Trillian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Trillian; MeekOneGOP; Conspiracy Guy; DocRock; King Prout; Darksheare; OSHA; martin_fierro; ...
I doubt that most feminists have much to worry about in this department.


163 posted on 04/06/2015 11:50:31 PM PDT by Slings and Arrows ("The Name" - http://youtu.be/PWzndzZcIMA | Facebook ID: Hopalong Ginsberg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: Slings and Arrows

I like bewbs. Just not so much on Bruce Jenner.


164 posted on 04/06/2015 11:57:13 PM PDT by RichInOC (We live in absurd times.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: Crazieman

Not just the homosexuals, the entire spectrum of alternative gender/sexual identities, because they consider “normal” even as in the demographic norm to be too much of an implied judgment on them.


165 posted on 04/06/2015 11:59:58 PM PDT by RichInOC (We live in absurd times.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RichInOC

You had to go there, didn’t you?


166 posted on 04/07/2015 12:09:49 AM PDT by Slings and Arrows ("The Name" - http://youtu.be/PWzndzZcIMA | Facebook ID: Hopalong Ginsberg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: Trillian

OMG I’m laughing so hard I’ll never get to sleep now... :) That’s GREAT!


167 posted on 04/07/2015 12:11:27 AM PDT by dayglored (Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is...sounding pretty good about now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

Wow. In the right hands, the poor dear might actually appreciate her own bewbs as sexual objects.

“Objectify me, objectify me, just yank my hair first!”

The poor dear.

Just crazy.


168 posted on 04/07/2015 2:32:53 AM PDT by Titan Magroyne (What one person receives without working for, another person must work for without receiving.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightistight; Slings and Arrows
McCrayer explains that “under a patriarchal system… we’re taught to believe that the female body exists solely for a man’s sexual pleasure and entertainment.”

SHE's the one with a sexist mindset. Some men enjoy their flabby breast implants too. Just ask Richard Speck.

169 posted on 04/07/2015 4:21:19 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (If Indiana's 'treatment' of homosexuals matters, why doesn't Cuba's treatment of homosexuals matter?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crazieman; pikachu
I’m seeing more of this ‘cis-’ enter the lexicon of the gay mafia.

Marxist Feminism’s Ruined Lives (Frontpagemag.com 9-2-2014 Mallory Millett (sister of NOW founder Kate Millett)

And so began my period as an unwitting witness to history. I stayed with Kate and her lovable Japanese husband, Fumio, in a dilapidated loft on The Bowery as she finished her first book, a PhD thesis for Columbia University, “Sexual Politics.”

It was 1969. Kate invited me to join her for a gathering at the home of her friend, Lila Karp. They called the assemblage a “consciousness-raising-group,” a typical communist exercise, something practiced in Maoist China. We gathered at a large table as the chairperson opened the meeting with a back-and-forth recitation, like a Litany, a type of prayer done in Catholic Church. But now it was Marxism, the Church of the Left, mimicking religious practice:

“Why are we here today?” she asked.
“To make revolution,” they answered.
“What kind of revolution?” she replied.
“The Cultural Revolution,” they chanted.
“And how do we make Cultural Revolution?” she demanded.
“By destroying the American family!” they answered.
“How do we destroy the family?” she came back.
“By destroying the American Patriarch,” they cried exuberantly.
“And how do we destroy the American Patriarch?” she replied.
“By taking away his power!”
“How do we do that?”
“By destroying monogamy!” they shouted.
“How can we destroy monogamy?”

Their answer left me dumbstruck, breathless, disbelieving my ears. Was I on planet earth? Who were these people?

“By promoting promiscuity, eroticism, prostitution and homosexuality!” they resounded.

They proceeded with a long discussion on how to advance these goals by establishing The National Organization of Women. It was clear they desired nothing less than the utter deconstruction of Western society. The upshot was that the only way to do this was “to invade every American institution. Every one must be permeated with ‘The Revolution’”: The media, the educational system, universities, high schools, K-12, school boards, etc.; then, the judiciary, the legislatures, the executive branches and even the library system.

It fell on my ears as a ludicrous scheme, as if they were a band of highly imaginative children planning a Brinks robbery; a lark trumped up on a snowy night amongst a group of spoiled brats over booze and hashish.


170 posted on 04/07/2015 4:25:31 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (If Indiana's 'treatment' of homosexuals matters, why doesn't Cuba's treatment of homosexuals matter?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: certrtwngnut
Send them all to a remote island and watch them try to procreate.


171 posted on 04/07/2015 4:31:29 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (Funny how Hollywood's 'No Nukes' crowd has been silent during Obama's Iranian nuclear negotiations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: catnipman
And I bet if a man finds breasts repugnant, then that’s “sexist” too.

Homosexuals are sexist, they reject those who are unlike themselves.

172 posted on 04/07/2015 4:34:36 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (Funny how Hollywood's 'No Nukes' crowd has been silent during Obama's Iranian nuclear negotiations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: rightistight

Feminists dont represent me or any woman that I resemble.

Sarah Pailin - She Represents!

Ok you freepers gonna get fresh.

: > )


173 posted on 04/07/2015 9:35:17 AM PDT by Uversabound (Our Military past and present: Our Highest example of Brotherhood of Man & Doing God's Will)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightistight

bookmark


174 posted on 04/10/2015 9:50:00 AM PDT by Steve0113
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-174 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson