ALL current and potential GOP candidates have or supports AMNESTY

EEE | 18 MARCH 2015 | EEE

[Extremely Extreme Extremist]

All undeclared and declared Republican presidential candidates are on record as to having supported or still supporting "comprehensive immigration reform" or a "pathway to citizenship", which is of course, AMNESTY:

- Ted Cruz: Sen. Ted Cruz also supports temporary legalization status in the immigration bill

- Sarah Palin, 2008: When asked if she supported “a path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants,” Palin responded that she did.

- Scott Walker: Yes, Gov. Walker supported a path to citizenship

- Mike Huckabee: Mike Huckabee supports amnesty for illegal aliens

- Chris Christie: Chris Christie supports amnesty for illegal aliens

- Marco Rubio: Rubio abandons GOP position, caves to Obama Executive Amnesty (Note: This is the 2nd time Rubio has back-stabbed the base, remember his "Gang of 8" bill with Chucky Schumer?)

- Rand Paul: Let's compromise on amnesty

- And Jeb Bush: I'm not going to post links, we all know he supports AMNESTY

My point is, WHO DO YOU TRUST MOVING FORWARD? Only Walker, Cruz, and Palin, if she chooses to run, have pledged to put border security first.

[sand88]

It isn't really proper to assign Sarah's statements from 2008 on this matter. Palin's position in 08 had to match McCain's.

I do not think that Sarah will run.

Her pronouncements over the past few years has clearly shown that she is 100% against Amnesty and illegal immigration.

Listening to Sarah on this matter you can see that she understands that any Amnesty will destroy our Republic as Founded.

After Sarah, I believe that Cruz is strongest against Amnesty.

With all that said, I can't see any leader that would do the right thing and work to eliminate birthright citizenship and advocate the deportation off ALL illegals (no matter how long that takes)

[trebb]

Border Security is NOT ENOUGH for me. Never will be. No legalization of those here illegally, or 'eff 'em all. No compromise on this issue, ever. Period.

There you have it - we have nobody worth voting fore so we should just usher in the hard core Leftists who not only has the same flaws, but is willing to break the law and pay to ship the illegals in while setting up "Illegal Foster Home Cities".

And we call the Left nuts...

[Eric Pode of Croydon]

If "amnesty" is defined as anything less than "grab them all by the scruff of the neck and toss all their sorry a$$e$ back across the border", then yep, they are all pro-amnesty.

Any freeper who insists on grab and toss as the only acceptable position will be staying home on election day.

[EternalVigilance]

They also all support immoral, unconstitutional “and then you can kill the baby” abortion legislation which denies equal protection to every person as our Constitution requires.

With the exception of one who seems to be coming around to the truth, they’re all judicial supremacists, and have therefore already fully surrendered the fight to defend marriage and the unalienable individual right to live.

And as far as I know, they all support the centerpiece programs of the New Deal and the Great Society, along with a myriad of other existing unconstitutional programs and agencies.

We’re so far from where we must be if we are going to save the republic that it isn’t funny.

[Mariner]

"There you have it - we have nobody worth voting fore so we should just usher in the hard core Leftists who not only has the same flaws, but is willing to break the law and pay to ship the illegals in while setting up "Illegal Foster Home Cities".

Wake up.

That hard core left includes the vast majority of the Republican Party. If you elect a Republican, odds are you're electing a hard core leftist/statist...he'll just tell you a different set of lies.

[trebb]

That hard core left includes the vast majority of the Republican Party. If you elect a Republican, odds are you're electing a hard core leftist/statist...he'll just tell you a different set of lies.

Perhaps, but they're not so likely to go lawless and screw us as royally and efficiently as an Obama.

I guess it really doesn't matter much anyway - I believe the Bible and it tells me the whole world will become a moral cesspool and there will be much suffering, including the slaughter of 2/3 of the Jews, so why even bother?

Not as rhetorical as it sounds - I'll continue to support the most conservative candidates available until they either make the final ticket or get bumped. Then I will vote against the most evil every time. Perhaps a useless exercise but I refuse to open the door for what the Left throws at me because my candidate is only 80%-85% conservative instead of the 99.44% that I was hoping for. To do otherwise is to keep the Obaam clones flowing through the WH in a virtual unopposed status.