Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ferguson Cop-Shooter Jeff Williams is Michael Brown Supporter, Said Murder was “Easy”
Pundit Press ^ | 3/15/15 | Aurelius

Posted on 03/15/2015 4:36:02 PM PDT by rightistight

Jeff Williams, who shot two Ferguson police officers, posted on Facebook about how “f*ked up” the actions of Darren Wilson were the day he shot and killed Michael Brown.

Despite this, protest leaders in Ferguson are distancing themselves from Williams, saying he was not a protester. Williams’s posts on social media show that to be a lie.

On a post dated January 15, Williams posted an extremely inaccurate video that he believed was an accurate representation of what happened between Michael Brown and Darren Wilson. The video showed Wilson attacking Brown, strangling him, and then shooting the teen while he had his hands up and was on his knees.

The video then shows the Ferguson police station’s version of events, as if it was their word against witnesses. In fact, Wilson’s version of events were corroborated by witnesses and forensic evidence.

Despite this, Williams wrote “f*ked up” on top of his post:

Jeffrey Williams Facebooj

In an earlier post, dated January 2nd, Williams said that it was "easy" to take a life:

Jeffrey Williams Facebook 2

(Excerpt) Read more at thepunditpress.com ...


TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS: ferguson; michaelbrown
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last
To: Georgia Girl 2

Jeffery was paid....If he shot the gun he was a pretty good shot....where did he learn that???
Who is Jeffery and who’s driving the red car

So, we have a 20 year old guy (apparently a non-resident of Ferguson,with a criminal record, surprise, surprise) with a possibly illegally possessed handgun, allegedly riding in a car, sees someone he was having a dispute with, and just impulsively decides to settle the dispute with gunfire - with dozens of police officers standing right there


41 posted on 03/15/2015 5:36:46 PM PDT by CGASMIA68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: CGASMIA68

from a previous poster


42 posted on 03/15/2015 5:37:57 PM PDT by CGASMIA68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: AnAmericanMother

I hate to be the one to clue you in that the Mossad’s chosen weapon is the .22.

A scoped 10-22 from 100 yards would have no problem with hitting those cops and in places where their vests did not protect. Pinpoint. I am flat out telling you I think this was a false flag shooting. Until somebody proves to me that those cops were shot with .40 cal ammo I am highly skeptical.

The reports I have heard and read said the shooter was shooting from the window of a building not a car.


43 posted on 03/15/2015 5:42:35 PM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose o f a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: CGASMIA68

I think what we all have to decide is if we are talking about a shooter from a window 100 plus yards away or a car nearbyl. I am talking about reports from 100 plus yards away.


44 posted on 03/15/2015 5:48:04 PM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose o f a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: MarkL

I said that exact same thing to my sister 2 days ago.


45 posted on 03/15/2015 5:48:05 PM PDT by VTenigma (The Democratic party is the party of the mathematically challenged)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Georgia Girl 2

Not necessarily. The cops were in riot formation, shoulder to shoulder. That meant all he had to do was shoot at the line, not any individual, get the elevation reasonably right, and just drop the rounds onto the line. Civil War soldiers did it all the time to packed lines of attacking troops. As far as damage from .40 cal. bullets is concerned, they lose a lot of velocity and wallop after traveling 100 yards.


46 posted on 03/15/2015 5:52:55 PM PDT by libstripper (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: rightistight
the boy simply "took a shot" and got lucky...

what'd Britt say???

47 posted on 03/15/2015 5:54:23 PM PDT by Chode (Stand UP and Be Counted, or line up and be numbered - *DTOM* -w- NO Pity for the LAZY - 86-44)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libstripper

Yeh but lets be real. Do you really want to buy into the theory that some little gang banger who never hit the range in his life hit two cops outside the vest from 100 plus yards? I mean lets get real. Its just not plausible.


48 posted on 03/15/2015 5:55:29 PM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose o f a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: AnAmericanMother

Please go to Youtube and lookup “How fare will a .22LR. kill? Many people have been killed by .22LR. rounds. The .22 LR round is not a toy or a joke ask the IDF as they love this round. (Double tape, back of the head done right) Have used the Hush Puppy myself in the shit and it works just fine. Have used the Remington Viper 40 gr. conical round myself on spotlight deer and it works. Dark Horse rules the night 3/5 “Get Some”


49 posted on 03/15/2015 5:58:19 PM PDT by lostboy61 (Lock and Load and stand your ground!.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: rightistight

He did not shoot two Ferguson police officers. He shot a St. Louis County officer and a Webster Groves officer.


50 posted on 03/15/2015 6:13:33 PM PDT by Cyclone59 (Where are we going, and what's with the handbasket?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightistight

A good DA should hammer them and get them to admit they believed the “hands up don’t shoot” crap, find out what protests they went to and what was said at the protests.


51 posted on 03/15/2015 6:13:52 PM PDT by Kid Shelleen (Beat your plowshares into swords. Let the weak say I am strong)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jsanders2001
Won't happen. Jury nullification.
52 posted on 03/15/2015 6:37:11 PM PDT by HandBasketHell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Cyclone59

picky picky picky..geshhhhhh


53 posted on 03/16/2015 5:05:30 AM PDT by CGASMIA68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Georgia Girl 2

So far I see two missing pieces to the puzzle: 1) although there’s lot of talk about the bullets coming from about 100 yard away, I’ve not seen a diagram showing exactly where the cartridge cases were found and 2) I’ve not seen any police statement that they have obtained the bullets that injured the two officers and matched those bullets to the pistol in question.


54 posted on 03/16/2015 7:18:05 AM PDT by libstripper (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: libstripper

“I’ve not seen any police statement that they have obtained the bullets that injured the two officers and matched those bullets to the pistol in question.”

Me neither so as far as anyone knows the guy they arrested may not even be the shooter. I assume they won’t know til the ballistics tests come back. Although you would think that the police could get a working theory just by looking at one of the bullets that get removed from the injured officers. If there are any. A .22 and a .40 are pretty different in size.


55 posted on 03/16/2015 7:51:30 AM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose o f a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Georgia Girl 2

A point to note about long-range shots with apparently inaccurate weapons: During the Hundred Years War in the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries, the primary English infantry weapon was the long bow, with a draw of about 140 lb. and an effective range of a little over 200 yds. Few, if any, English archers were able to hit individual French knights at that range. However, they didn’t have to because the French charged the English in densely pack formations, meaning the English archers just aimed at those formations, and slaughtered thousands of French men at arms. The cops being in a tightly paced riot formation, a similar thing could have happened at Ferguson.


56 posted on 03/16/2015 9:22:48 AM PDT by libstripper (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: rightistight

Did they get the ballistics tests back?


57 posted on 03/16/2015 1:06:39 PM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose o f a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Georgia Girl 2

From early descriptions , there should be hundreds of shell casings just laying on the street.

There were reports of gunfire before the two NON FERGUSON cops got shot.

One report said the shots came from the grassy knoll . One said they came from the midst of the crowd protesting in front of the police station.

I wonder ‘where’ they found the shell casings?


58 posted on 03/16/2015 3:09:01 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Georgia Girl 2

I would be more likely to believe that....

This idiot did drive up and shoot at his ‘competitors’ in front of the cops (but didn’t hit them) and that...

some anarchist used the cover of the random gunfire that had been occurring to plug the cops.


59 posted on 03/16/2015 3:16:58 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Cyclone59
He did not shoot two Ferguson police officers. He shot a St. Louis County officer and a Webster Groves officer.

True, but facts are not important to these protestors. They still claim Mike Brown had his hands up and that Wilson shot Brown in the back of the head.

60 posted on 03/16/2015 3:24:12 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson