Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Fantasywriter
Also, no matter what she used her parents’ address for—and we have only your guesswork that she used it for anything—she would have given her actual address upon giving birth.

Was that where she was when she conceived? Was that where she was when she left for the hospital to give birth?

Have you considered that she might have been too embarrassed to give her actual address to the person typing into the form? That she simply reflexively gave out 6085?

That she never considered how badly that would screw up the mind of one FW more than half a century later? Too bad she didn't live to see it!!

296 posted on 01/30/2015 11:22:53 PM PST by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 294 | View Replies ]


To: cynwoody

‘Was that where she was when she conceived?’

What a weird question. (1) it has no answer, and (2) it’s irrelevant.

‘Was that where she was when she left for the hospital to give birth?’

Not according to Cindy Pratt. Pratt says Stanley Ann “never” lived there. Plus, Pratt was interviewed by a lefty-lib major Obama fan, Maraniss. If Maraniss could have pried any Obama-friendly info out of Pratt, he’s have done so. As it is, he softens the blow as much as possible by saying Pratt doesn’t “remember” baby Barry being brought into the house. As if that’s something one would (1) not notice, or (2) forget.

No, Maraniss did everything he could to support Obama’s narrative. It’s just that the truth, which Maraniss ended up having to report [otherwise the people he interviewed might have pointed out that he printed the opposite of what they said] shot the legs out from under Obama’s lying lies.

‘Have you considered that she might have been too embarrassed to give her actual address to the person typing into the form?’

Lol. I can’t believe I’m reading this. So your new theory is that Stanley Ann couldn’t give out her real address for shame. Another Obama-loving evidence-free theory, courtesy of an alleged non-Obot. [Truth: I don’t believe you’re an Obot. But I also don’t believe how far you’re willing to go to justify a pathological liar. But hey, it takes all kinds.]

‘That she simply reflexively gave out 6085?’

So she ‘reflexively’ gave out an address at which she never lived, and at which we have no evidence she even visited. That goes beyond even grasping at straws. I cannot conceive of ever being so desperate to support Obama’s lies that I would shimmy that far out on such a thin limb. I just hope you’re not typing things tonight that will embarrass you tomorrow...if you get my drift.

‘That she never considered how badly that would screw up the mind of one FW more than half a century later? Too bad she didn’t live to see it!!’

And birthers are accused of being the irrational ones. Thanks to Alinsky, black is white and up is down. (I.e.: I’m the ‘crazy birther,’ but I’m sticking to the facts, and you’re the ‘rational’ anti-birther, and your makig things up left and right, and flailing for a straw, any straw, to grab onto.) Thankfully, only a few conservatives buy into Alinsky’s views.


297 posted on 01/30/2015 11:54:22 PM PST by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 296 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson