Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: cynwoody; butterdezillion; Fantasywriter

Cynwoody, (ping to butterdezillion & Fantasywriter )

Thanks for posting those!

I defer to butterdezillion in regards to the details on the microfilms tampering.

A thought:

If someone does have the physical hardcopy original of their birth announcement, that shows the lines above and below it, they should video it & have a friend put it up on you tube.

Not all Democrats are happy with 0.

Some time before the ‘12 elections, Abercrombie had his people go on a search & they found only some hand written form in the dept of health archives.

There’s probably more Democrats unhappy now.


280 posted on 01/30/2015 7:52:04 PM PST by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57, returning after lurking since 2001)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 278 | View Replies ]


To: Fantasywriter

Adding to previous post:

And defer to Fantasywriter on the microfilm tampering.


281 posted on 01/30/2015 7:53:36 PM PST by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57, returning after lurking since 2001)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 280 | View Replies ]

To: WildHighlander57

Just a slight correction. No handwritten ‘form’ was ever found by Abercrombie or his small army of searchers. He was informed that something was ‘written down’ but no ‘form’ was mentioned. As noted in a prior post, the item ‘written down’ was most likely the birth registered by Grannie Dunham; i.e.: the one she claimed to be for Stanley Ann, though Madelyn could supply no address for her daughter. Maddy used her own address instead, despite the fact that Stanley Ann never lived there.


282 posted on 01/30/2015 8:40:33 PM PST by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 280 | View Replies ]

To: WildHighlander57
If someone does have the physical hardcopy original of their birth announcement, that shows the lines above and below it, they should video it & have a friend put it up on you tube.

That would generate more questions than answers.

A better recommendation would be to scan the clipping at 600 dpi on a flatbed scanner and post the resulting the image. It will be large, but most people have broadband these days, and the result will be like going over the clipping with a jeweler's loupe.

287 posted on 01/30/2015 10:39:33 PM PST by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 280 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson