[WildHighlander57]

I agree with you about grannie submitting the “at-home” birth doc.

There’s still this point:

What we have are microfilms of the announcements as posted in the two papers.... with evidence that they’ve been messed with.

What we need are the hardcopies... isn’t there -anyone- born in Honolulu august 1961 with a hardcopy?

Especially if its got a notable persons name on it.

[Fantasywriter]

‘isn’t there -anyone- born in Honolulu august 1961 with a hardcopy?’

Perhaps what you’re asking is, isn’t there any conservative with a hardcopy. Given the pervasive liberal-leanings of HI, the odds are low. If a liberal/Dem had a hardcopy that was damaging to Obama, it would almost certainly never see the light of day.

[cynwoody]

What we need are the hardcopies... isn’t there -anyone- born in Honolulu august 1961 with a hardcopy?

From the Sunday Advertiser on 13 August (larger version here):

And the Honolulu Star-Bulletin on 14 August:

Get busy!

I wonder if Eleanor Nordyke clipped either announcement.

Just for fun, here's another version of the Sunday Advertiser, taken from a different microfilm, allegedly at the LoC:

And here is the LoC's version of the Honolulu Star-Bulletin:

We see that the Libray of Congress microfilms are in much better shape than those in the Hawaii State Library. But both show the same information.

What we have are microfilms of the announcements as posted in the two papers.... with evidence that they’ve been messed with.

Good luck proving that.