They secured a large advance for Obama to write Journeys in Black and White, which began with Obama’s Kenyan birth. When he failed to produce the ms, they secured a second large advance for the same book. This is a matter of record.
‘They’ = Acton & Dystel
In 1990, it was reported (based on interviews and/or input from Obama) by the NY Times, Washington Post, Chicago Tribune, and L.A. Times -- four of the widest circulation and top-echelon newspapers in the U.S. -- that Obama was "born in Hawaii." As of 1990, Obama's Hawaiian birth was thus a matter of public record.
But you can't see why in 1991 the idea of Obama producing a "born in Kenya" book is thus a total non-starter, a proposition that would make Acton & Dystel look utterly foolish?
Your lack of critical thinking skills continues to amaze.