Your link does refer to a makeshift ‘room’ outside the Dunham’s bedroom [isn’t that space more typically referred to as the ‘hall’?] but it also says that neither Ann nor the ‘infant’ ever lived there. It also mentions that the Pratt’s daughter has no memory of Ann bringing a baby home to that location.
Highly selective quoting there, Cynwoody. Your link proves my point, not yours.
Why are you so invested in defending Obama’s version of his nativity, anyway? He’s a pathological liar. The lies he has told about his birth are well documented. Besides, we have a couple of well-known, outed Obot trolls [one a retread] working hard to prop up Obama’s lies. Is it really necessary for conservatives to pitch in and help them?
& btw, what was the point of even mentioning this ‘makeshift room,’ if neither Stanley Ann nor the baby ever lived there? The same source that claims a ‘room’ existed outside the parents’ room also notes that Stanley Ann never lived in it. So why bring it up at all?
So what?
Highly selective quoting there, Cynwoody. Your link proves my point, not yours.
Do explain why. What's my point? What's your point? If you're going to troll, you'd better get your ass in gear!
Why are you so invested in defending Obama’s version of his nativity, anyway?
What's Obama's version? That his mama married an alcoholic bigamist? That they never lived together? That, when he was three weeks old, his mama felt compelled to haul him across a few thousand miles of water to get away from the father of his dreams? That's Obama's version? I've watched his 2004 keynote a few times, and I don't recall those facts being trotted out.
If that's what happened, that's what happened. Whether it fits your narrative or not!
Besides, we have a couple of well-known, outed Obot trolls [one a retread] working hard to prop up Obama’s lies.
Kindly name the trolls and the retread and explain how they are propping up Obama's lies.
Is it really necessary for conservatives to pitch in and help them?
Conservatives stand with the truth, no matter who's interest is helped or harmed.
& btw, what was the point of even mentioning this ‘makeshift room,’ if neither Stanley Ann nor the baby ever lived there? The same source that claims a ‘room’ existed outside the parents’ room also notes that Stanley Ann never lived in it. So why bring it up at all?
Why don't you ask David Maraniss?