How convenient of you to provide an irrelevant video.
Why don'i you try a useful video?
Posted on 01/21/2015 9:36:01 PM PST by grundle
Obama was sired by an Indonesian cult guru named Muhammed Subuh when mama Stanley Ann was on a cult kick as a fancy free young person. Mama was kicked out of the cult and then found a Kenyon student in Hawaii to be the surrogate father. Obama has/had a lot of info locked away as soon as he was elected POTUSA. Someday by some means Obama’s trickery/treachery will be exposed and I have no pity for his enablers such as Jarrett or family members.
Then our preezee has assumed office under a fabricated identity. He's a FELON!
‘It’s the address she gave, but any other address in the area would have sufficed equally.’
Your post didn’t even begin to make sense, not one line of it. Skipping the rest of the gobbledygook, what did you mean by the above line? I agree it’s the address Grannie Dunham gave. But no other address would have sufficed because neither she nor her daughter lived at any other address.
‘It is as irrelevant to the birther cause as it is testimony to your obsession. Please get help.’
Why are you and most other anti-birthers so infantile in the insults to resort to with such embarrassing regularity? I would like, for once, to talk to an adult on this subject. It has yet to happen.
Or is the above your way of admitting you’re on the losing end of this discussion? When anti-birthers run out of arguments they typically resort to ad hominem.
to resort to
=
you resort to
Adjust lecturer.
Thanks for that link. I’ve seen it before, but I don’t think the lawyer goes quite as far as to admit Obama’s LFBC is a forgery. The way it reads to me is that Hill knew the judge was in the satchel (for Obama), and she desperately wanted to avoid presenting a hard copy of the online image of Obama’s so-called birth certificate. So she said Obama didn’t have to prove anything in Jersey, and of course the judge agreed. Whatever it takes to keep the cut and pasted fabrication away from public scrutiny is what they’ll do, you understand.
It’s just more of the shoddy way the courts have always and will always treat challenges to Obama. Conservatives are used to it.
Here's the official word:
Statement Regarding Barack Obama
The Law School has received many media requests about Barack Obama, especially about his status as "Senior Lecturer."From 1992 until his election to the U.S. Senate in 2004, Barack Obama served as a professor in the Law School. He was a Lecturer from 1992 to 1996. He was a Senior Lecturer from 1996 to 2004, during which time he taught three courses per year. Senior Lecturers are considered to be members of the Law School faculty and are regarded as professors, although not full-time or tenure-track. The title of Senior Lecturer is distinct from the title of Lecturer, which signifies adjunct status. Like Obama, each of the Law School's Senior Lecturers has high-demand careers in politics or public service, which prevent full-time teaching. Several times during his 12 years as a professor in the Law School, Obama was invited to join the faculty in a full-time tenure-track position, but he declined.
Here's the vid. Where does she say it?
If you were a left wing Democrat and that birth information was available 54 years later to expose your life story and destroy your presidency, would you “lock away” the damning records or would you have them destroyed?
Anything “locked away” can be uncovered and unlocked, but birth records from a third world country in the pre-computer era can be destroyed forever with a single lighted match.
Lol! What a ‘professor.’ He was barely literate. Here’s one of his exam questions:
“Law week, two men, Richard and Michael, walked into you office and asked for your help.
You learn that they are a monogamous, gay couple who have been living
together for the past ten years. Both men are successful architects, and after devoting the past decade on their respective careers, they have now decided that they want to marry and raise children together.”
http://www.westernjournalism.com/exclusive-investigative-reports/is-obama-stupid-and-lazy/
‘In a blog post by at DougRoss@Journal on March 1, 2010, “To be (a lawyer) or not to be... “, comments are offered from one who corroborates that Obama’s “teaching career” at The University of Chicago, was to put it kindly, a sham. This evaluation came about after talks the individual had with the highest tenured faculty members at Chicago Law about Obama, who was Barry at the time. Among them were:
* Obama applied for a position as an adjunct and wasn’t even considered.
* A few weeks later the law school got a phone call from the Board of Trustees telling them to find him an office, put him on the payroll, and give him a class to teach.
* The Board told Obama that he didn’t have to be a member of the faculty, but they needed to give him a temporary position.
* Obama was described by other professors as being lazy, unqualified, never attending any of the faculty meeting. It was clear that the position was nothing more than a political stepping stool.
* Some doubted whether Obama was legitimately an editor on the Harvard Law Review, because, if so, he would be the first and only editor of an Ivy League law review to never be published while in school.
The same blogger then asked reader to consider:
1. Having surrendered his license back in 2008, Obama is no longer a lawyer (allegations that the surrendering occurred to escape charges that Obama “fibbed” on his bar application.).
2. According to a Chicago Sun-Time article: “Obama did not ‘hold the title’ of a University of Chicago law school professor.”
3. According to Marsha Ferziger Nagorsky, an Assistant Dean for Communications and Lecturer in Law at the University of Chicago School of Law, “He did not hold the title of professor of law.”
4. As a former Constitutional senior lecturer, how could Obama cite the U.S. Constitution during a State of the Union Address with a quote that was from the Declaration of Independence?’
There’s a lot more at the site...all of it devastating.
Trust me. Professors do not regard adjuncts of any kind to be professors. The adjuncts may call themselves professors but the real professors do not regard them as such in any way. They are adjuncts.
The judge in this eligibility challenge ruled: “No court, federal, state or administrative, has accepted the challengers’ position that Mr. Obama is not a “natural born Citizen” due to the acknowledged fact that his father was born in Kenya and was a British citizen by virtue of the then applicable British Nationality Act. Nor has the fact that Obama had, or may have had, dual citizenship at the time of his birth and thereafter been held to deny him the status of natural born. It is unnecessary to reinvent the wheel here. … The petitioners’ legal position on this issue, however well intentioned, has no merit in law. Thus, accepting for the point of this issue that Mr. Obama was born in Hawaii, he is a ‘natural born Citizen’ regardless of the status of his father.” New Jersey Administrative Law Judge Jeff S. Masin, April 10, 2012
The New Jersey Secretary of State, Kim Guadagno, a Republican approved Obama for the state ballot; the plaintiffs appealed to the New Jersey Supreme Court but the petition was denied.
I tend to think that Obama never intended his conception and birth records be valid and open until such do not destroy his scam. His kissing up to the Saudi kingdom and mama’s SE Asian communist connections will not be a detriment to his intentions for the US which never did give mama and papa(whoever you choose) due recognition.
Kindly cue the video to where she asserts the BC is a forgery and provide a transcript. You can cue a YouTube video by appending, for example, &t=3m30s to the URL.
If that's the case, if they disagree with the official word, the U of C Law School faculty needs to get on their administration's case and force them to revise their official statement. Until they do, I'll assume that they do indeed regard adjuncts as described in the official statement.
The Sun-Times does not get to decide who is a U of C law professor. For better or worse, only the U of C does. And that's a fact!
http://www.scribd.com/doc/88910250/Purpura-Moran-Initial-Decision-of-ALJ-Masin#scribd
Excerpt:
In Wong Kim Ark,Justice Gray wrote at great length about the understanding of the term “natural born” and its common law meaning, probing English authorities and concluding that the “law of England for the last three centuries, beginning before the settlement of this country, and continuing to the present day, . . . every child born in England of alien parents was a natural-born subject, unless the child of an ambassador or other diplomatic agent of a foreign state, or of an alien enemy in hostile occupation of the place where the childwas born. The same rule was in force in all the English colonies upon this continent down to the time of the Declaration of Independence, and in the United States afterwards, and continued to prevail under the constitution as originally established. ”This position as to the common law meaning is in accord with Justice Joseph Story’s statement, concurring in Inglis v. Trustees of Sailors’ Snug Harbor, 28 U.S. (3 Pet.) 99, 7 L. Ed. 617 (1830), “Nothing is better settled at the common law than the doctrine that the children, even of aliens, born in a country, while the parents reside there under the protection of the government, and owing a temporary allegiance thereto, are subjects by birth.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
