Posted on 01/13/2015 8:44:19 AM PST by rightistight
If I wanted to consult with immature ignoramuses I’d read Salon, but I have no reason to consult with immature ignoramuses.
Salon is correct. It IS racist.
Of course, you have to use the new definition of racism:
rac·ist ˈrāsəst/ noun 1. Anyone who disagrees with any liberal about any topic whatsoever. (ex: "Radical islam is peaceful." "That is crazy!" "RACIST!") 2. A person who wins an argument with a liberal. (ex: "So that, you see, is why working is good! Q.E.D." "RACIST!"
Worth repeating, because people today don't seem to know anything about anything.
That little fact isn't some unrelated profiling!
It is THE CAUSATIVE FACTOR!!!
That FACT IS the story!!!
Indeed
Do we really expect any more than foolishness from Salon writers?
Are they honestly so stupid to believe that the Muslims won’t kill them, too?
Didn’t take long. The victims were just lowered into the ground and already the left is rushing to the defense of the subhuman savages it loves so much.
It is “RACIST” to “NOT” point out they’re muslims
“In an article published yesterday, Salon.com asserted that it is “racist” to point out that the Paris attackers, who murdered over a dozen people over a caricature of Muhammad, were Muslims.”
By publishing the article, they have themselves pointed it out. Racists.
Muslim is not a race. Liberals are idiots.
Yeah. ‘Muslim’ is not a race. No more than is ‘Jewish’.
Number 3,094,093 in Salon’s list of what constitutes a racist acts. All committed by white people, of course.
Heads up, terrorism has been redefined.
Since when is a religion a race?..................
Well... well... well, then you’re racist against African American Senagalese French Muslim guys... well, I mean terrorist African American guys born in Senegal living in France who look like Americans born in Africa Muslims living in Detroit... kinda... guys...
But when the liberal uses it, they automatically win.
The people at Salon can’t even get that right. I see parallels between this sad and tired argument and that of the unemployment numbers we get. In both cases we are told constantly one narrative (Islam is not at the heart of terrorism; unemployment is improving) but the public at large in increasingly believing its “lying eyes” over what our leaders are saying.
It is becoming comical - almost to the point that only those with a vested interest to ignore reality are willing to suspend reason to actually nod their heads in agreement to such articles.
“Islam is the a abomination that causes desolation.”
that is quickly becoming clear - as is that the “false prophet” is mohammed. Back in the seventies, when everyone was totally convinced that it was a man, i read a small book that theorized that it was in fact an ideaology. They had a great deal of supporting arguments that seemed sound. They appear to have been right. Wish I could remember the book.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.