Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: SWAMPSNIPER

what are you talking about?!? are you drunk?

disparity of force is totally valid.

if you are older, smaller, injured, disabled, ambushed, outnumbered, disparity of force works in your favor for self-defense. it allows the victim to use equal or greater force on their attackers.

you either don’t know what disparity of force is or you think victims ought to just get the sh1t beaten out of them or be killed.


10 posted on 12/20/2014 5:52:53 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: Secret Agent Man

The prosecuter was claiming that use of a knife against an “unarmed” assailant is disparate force. I haven’t had a drink in years BTW.


13 posted on 12/20/2014 6:34:07 PM PST by SWAMPSNIPER (The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not A Matter of Opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson