There’s been a tremendous buzz about the future of graphene.
I hope people understand that if we start emitting h2o in large quantities THAT will be a big greenhouse gas issue!
“Sounds too good to be true, but what if it’s not?”
The biggest problem for this is that there is very very little hydrogen in the atmosphere.
Nitrogen — N2 — 78.084%
Oxygen — O2 — 20.9476%
Argon — Ar — 0.934%
Carbon Dioxide — CO2 — 0.0314%
Neon — Ne — 0.001818%
Methane — CH4 — 0.0002%
Helium — He — 0.000524%
Krypton — Kr — 0.000114%
Hydrogen — H2 — 0.00005%
Xenon — Xe — 0.0000087%
It will be bought and kept out of the market by the oil companies (car companies, Saudis, conspiracy group of the day) like the carburetor that allows car to get 100 MPG.
/tin-foil hat off
Lozada-Hidalgo added “the achieved flow of hydrogen is of course tiny so far”
Albert Einstein, was at one time, but a gleam in his father’s eye.
Rab.
Insane in the.....
It is to good to be true.
Every single one of these schemes works, for a while. Then the membrane gets poisoned and the cell stops working. You can burn out the poison but it takes more energy than it is worth to do it.
That is the real problem, not the straw-man setup here in the article.
If you can figure out how to build a system around it many solids can work here as a membrane but they only start running at 600C.
The Research and Development Degree of Difficulty, or RD3 is a “V” or 5 which combined with a Technology Readiness Level, or TRL of 2 means no.
This is hugh and series. Unfortunately it’s not going anywhere as the EPA will put a stop to it.
Global warming issue. The owners will be taxed into the next century.
Tomorrow I could invent an energy that converts liberals’ good intentions in to limitless electricity. Liberals would still complain about it. And they would find an endangered 3 speckled toad to shut it all down.