A racist drones on and on and on trying to prove racism when he has no case.
In before the zot. Anyone who thinks like this would be hung should I become the reincarnation of Genhis Khan. Publicly.
No need to worry about the guy who wrote this stream of idiocy - he’s clearly too stupid to be a danger to anyone other than himself.
Opinions are like a-holes, everybody’s got one.
He says it’s easy for a prosecutor to get an indictment. I understand it is NOT easy given that Darren Wilson was LE and the perp tried to get his gun.
This guy is full of it.
I won’t even attempt to correct any of his errors. Suffice to say that it is foolish to try to reason one out of a position they weren’t reasoned into in the first place.
The author will doggedly hold those flawed and idiotic POV until hell itself freezes over. I don’t care (as long as he doesn’t try to enforce any of his nonsense on me or mine).
He’s in for a very unhappy life.
“Racists consider testimony “credible” only when it buttresses their preconcieved notions”
I guess all the protesters are racist using your logic.
I am racist ... not A racist ... just racist ... and I could never come to the conclusions you have
Let’s just make the police departments a division of Welcome Wagon International (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Welcome_Wagon). That will make these groups happy. sarc
“But Officer Wilson was not in that situation. He could have scooted out of the way and, if need be, called for back-up. “
A police officer has a job to do. He cannot run away from trouble.
Decades of indoctrination, propaganda, false narratives and history, and hand outs have purchased most of these poor folks hearts and souls.
Almost no amount of evidence...no logic...no truth will cut through their programming.
But we should try...while at the same time making unambiguously clear that their entitlement attitude, their desire for some kind of endless reparations for things that the ancestors of the people they demand things from shed a river of blood to end...is simply not going to be tolerated or accepted.
Everyone of them should have to read the following article and then sit down and discuss what their race pimps like Marion Barry, Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson, Barack Obama, etc. have actually been doing to them and their families.
"The over-riding segments of the population that enabled Barack Obama's victory in 2012 were the Black vote (who voted for him by over 90%) and the Latino vote (who voted for him by over 70%).
"And they did so, absolutely against their own best interest.
"Oh, in the short term it can certainly be argued that Obama's campaign of "social justice," and equalizing the playing field from his perspective...which perspective is a socialist, redistribution of wealth perspective at best, and a Marxist perspective at worst, is appealing to voters who find themselves as a group the most negatively impacted in terms of employment, family stability, poverty, and crime rates in the nation, and particularly during this long standing economic down turn.
"When a politician promises specifically to "right these wrongs," and to give these voting blocks "stuff," be it contraceptives, food stamps, a portion of other people's income, free school loans, easier housing, etc., etc. one can see why people would be tempted to vote for them. And make no mistake, that is exactly what the progressive left is doing, as they have done for decades. Dangling entitlements and free "stuff," in front of people in an effort to buy their vote.
"But everything has a cost...as we shall see...and the cost is horrific for those whose life styles, livelihoods, and social positioning are adversely impacted.
"Despite it being hard to look beyond the entitlements and hand-outs, it is all the more important to examine the record of the politicians promising such things. Perhaps they do so to hide their actual record. What they have actually done (or not done) for these constituencies, is a critical determination to make before making a decision as to who should lead this nation and address its economic and social problems.
"This nation spends over a trillion dollars on welfare every year. Since the inception of the "Great Society" under Lyndon Johnson in the 1960s, this nation has spent tens of trillions of dollars at the behest of the progressive left to try and "equalize," things by "giving" away money, perks, food stamps, house loans, school loans, etc., etc.
"Have things improved?
"No, they have not.
"By abandoning the time honored and proven methods of hard work, personal accountability and responsibility, advancement due to merit, and the natural competiveness and reward of the free market, these socialist policies have failed...and are failing here in the United States, and failing miserably...just like they have everywhere else on earth they have been attempted." "
It goes on to share the demographic and statistical data in detail.
Every American should see it...and particularly Black and Latino Americans. The facts do not lie.
Let this piece be a lesson to all writers -- listen to that little, inner voice in your brain. It's usually correct.
wow
That is deeply disturbing. I particularly would point out number 8, which roughly should translate to: let’s not blame the people from the outside who come into your community, burn your small businesses, and make your entire city look like a war zone, only to go back to their own houses once the festivities are over. They are all an illusion, or a joke, woo.
“4. McCulloch could have gotten an indictment if he wanted one. As the commonly-heard saying has it, a DA can get a grand jury to indict a ham sandwich.”
Sure, a decent prosecutor could get a grand jury to indict a ham sandwich.
BUT ... then he’d have to prosecute that ham sandwich, wrecking his career in the process.
Yes, McCulloch could have gotten Wilson indicted. But then he’d have to prosecute him - and given the evidence seen, that prosecution would fail miserably, wrecking his career in the process.
Yes, it’s entirely possible that McCulloch used the GJ to derail the case - because there wasn’t a viable case. His other options were either not pursuing the issue at all (for which he would be destroyed in the court of public opinion), or go straight to trial (for which he would be destroyed in the court of law); taking it to the GJ was a way to publicize the evidence and get a jury to formally agree there was no viable case.
Aside from the fact that he’s wrong on nearly every one of his numbered points above, Mr. Cannon has clearly not thought this thing through. The idea that you treat police officers and their families like that and expect them to start acting nicely in reply is so delusional one has to wonder if the author is off his badly needed medications.
Cannon Fodder
(a/k/a Birdcage-Liner)
Do the cops a favor, Joe. Next time you need one, don’t call for help.