Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

EPA Puts Inert Argon on List of Banned Pesticide Ingredients
cnsnews ^ | Nov. 7, 2014 | Barbara Hollingsworth

Posted on 11/08/2014 7:38:42 AM PST by PROCON

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last
To: Pearls Before Swine

Neil Bartlett made several Argon compounds using Fluorine. (I think he should have won a Nobel Prize for this work.) It’s not easy to make Argon compounds, but it is possible.


41 posted on 11/08/2014 12:52:10 PM PST by mike70
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

Argon is dangerous! It’s a major component of those horrible incandescent light bulbs.


42 posted on 11/08/2014 1:32:44 PM PST by RansomOttawa (tm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RansomOttawa
Argon is dangerous! It’s a major component of those horrible incandescent light bulbs.


43 posted on 11/08/2014 1:40:17 PM PST by PROCON (OK 'pubs, let's get 'er done in 2015 or 2016 won't bode well for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: mike70

Interesting. I guess flourine can react with almost anything!


44 posted on 11/08/2014 1:41:12 PM PST by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: mike70

Interesting. I guess flourine can react with almost anything!


45 posted on 11/08/2014 1:41:49 PM PST by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: mike70

Interesting. I guess flourine can react with almost anything!


46 posted on 11/08/2014 1:46:22 PM PST by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: mike70

Interesting. I guess flourine can react with almost anything!


47 posted on 11/08/2014 1:52:38 PM PST by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: poobear

The article was about Argon in pesticides. The chemistry professor cited in the article stomped government “scientists” pretty good.


48 posted on 11/08/2014 2:14:58 PM PST by Cold Heart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Cold Heart

I know what the article was about. Banning this inert agent would cause many problems was my point. Hate a counter point luv?
Tough


49 posted on 11/08/2014 8:26:03 PM PST by poobear (Socialism in the minds of the elites, is a con-game for the serfs, nothing more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: The Antiyuppie

Produce in the sense of producing coal or oil, i.e., extracting it and making it commercially useful. I did a little on-line research, and sure enough, the greatest cost in producing oxygen and nitrogen is the cost of the electricity used to liquefy the raw stock (air), and it is produced by fractional distillation of liquid air.


50 posted on 11/09/2014 4:59:15 AM PST by Lonesome in Massachussets (This is known as "bad luck". - Robert A. Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: PROCON
This means that if you use air as a propellant for a pesticide, you are violating some silly EPA regulation as air contains inert 0.93 % Argon?

EPA is trying to pretend that it is nothing:

As EPA Assistant Administrator James Jones explains in this letter, the EPA is responding to petitions from California Attorney General Kamela Harris and others who asked for new labeling of pesticide ingredients. The EPA rejected the petition and instead offered a compromise proposal (not an official regulation yet). They looked through the list of inert ingredients that are generally approved for use in pesticide formulations, picked only the ones that aren't used anymore, and propose to remove them from the list. If someone wants to use them again, they'll have to go through the normal approval process. That gives some protection from poisoning at a minimum of hassle.
http://theweek.com/speedreads/index/270917/speedreads-no-the-epa-is-not-banning-argon

However, if you are producing a pesticide and it contains air in the package etc you are still violating the silly regulation.

We still have time to send them comments:

“The agency will be accepting public comments on the proposed action until Nov. 21.”
http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=EPA-HQ-OPP-2014-0558-0001

51 posted on 11/09/2014 7:07:31 AM PST by AdmSmith (GCTGATATGTCTATGATTACTCAT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PROCON; al baby; Albion Wilde; Allegra; BufordP; EveningStar; Gefn; GunsareOK; JRios1968; ...

Power deludes, and absolute power deludes absolutely.

Now inert gases are somehow dangerous? I suppose one could be if your sucked it into your lungs from a balloon full of it.

DANG!


52 posted on 11/09/2014 12:49:03 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (The mods stole my tagline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PROCON; RansomOttawa

She’s screaming, “IT’S MERCURY, DAMMIT! MERRRRRCURRRRRYYYYY!!!”


53 posted on 11/09/2014 12:50:10 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (The mods stole my tagline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson