Group Seeks to Put Term Limits on Grand Rapids Mayor, City Commissioners

Rina Baker and Bonnie Burke are long-time Grand Rapids residents unhappy that the same old policies and politics seem to dominate their city government.

So, last March, in 12-degree temperatures, they went door-to-door asking residents to sign a petition to place a term limits proposal on the November ballot. The initiative would limit the mayor and city commissioners to only allow a person to serve two four-year terms in office.

The response was overwhelming. Within months, they had recruited 45 people to circulate petitions. They called their group the “Grand Rapids Citizens for Municipal Term Limits” and by summer had collected 10,000 signatures, some 3,400 more than needed.

Baker and Burke say they're glad the proposal got on the ballot this year, a year in which voters are choosing a governor. Local turnout for gubernatorial elections is several times higher than it is for mayor and city commission.

But they're not finished yet. Recently, the two women have dodged bad weather, dogs and on one morning a dead mouse while going door-to-door asking residents to support the measure at the polls and place “vote yes for term limits” signs in front of their houses.

According to the Michigan Municipal League, 27 municipalities in the state have term limits for local elected officials.

With the exception of Chicago, nine out of the 10 largest cities in the U.S have term limits. In 1992, Michigan voters approved term limits for state lawmakers by an 18-point margin.

Baker and Burke say they have gotten support from all groups: progressive, conservative, minority, young and old.

The Grand Rapids City Commission is made up of the mayor and six commissioners. All are part time and are non-partisan. By 2017, five of the panel of seven would have served at least two terms. A published report from city attorney Catherine Mish questioned whether the proposal would apply to those already in office. She did not respond to a request for comment.

Opponents of term limits say voters can already kick politicians out of office on Election Day. But Baker and Burke note that few people vote in municipal elections. Turnout for the last election in 2013 was 14 percent.

“Low turnout favors incumbents," Baker said. "They rely on their loyal base to dominate such a low number and control the election.”

Four groups have publicly opposed the effort: the local Chamber of Commerce, the local AFL-CIO, the Grand Rapids Press and a group calling itself “Protect Your Vote,” led by local political science professor, Glenn Barkan.

Burke is not surprised by the groups fighting term limits and offers a reason why she thinks they are.

“I think they have time to develop relationships with the people in power once they are familiar," she said. "Lobbyists and special interests become friends with politicians and naturally have a voice where the common man doesn’t necessarily have that access."

Baker ran unsuccessfully for city comptroller and city commissioner, but denies her push for term limits is sour grapes.

“I see a great need in fixing a system, first and foremost that will allow people [in] – and it doesn’t have to be me," she said. "I want to be part of creating a more fair and equitable system. That’s where I want to concentrate my energy.”

Opponents have conducted a mass mailing of post cards in which the phrase “term limits” is noticeably absent. Instead the card urges voters to “protect your vote” and not to “change the local charter.” The group did not respond to a request for comment.

None of this pushback surprises Paul Jacob, who sits on the board of directors of the U.S Term Limits organization, and was one of the organizers of the nationwide term limits movement of the early 1990s. He said in an email:

"This grassroots campaign for term limits in Grand Rapids shows just how citizens can take back their government from the insiders and special interests. They'll be outspent by those powerful special interests, but voters very much want the new blood and new ideas that term limits bring."

The local pro-term limit group hopes to raise money for a mass mailing. Currently, it is passing out cards with a baby in a diaper and a quote from Mark Twain: “Politicians and diapers must be changed often and for the same reason.”

According to the most recent study by the U.S. Term Limits Foundation, nationwide, 58 million people live in municipalities with term limits for local elected officials.

I’ve been hearing talk of doing the same in Jackson as well.

Next on the agenda is ditching the full time legislature.

This is the NUMBER 1 issue that I’m voting on.

Our city government is stocked with left-wing nuts that have been working the past few years to assemble together a voting block of blue state transplants and Obamabots in the inner city to out vote the rest of the city. They have successfully used them to hike taxes twice, and they want to use them in order to remain in office since there are no term limits.

Our “mayor” has been in office for a decade, and needs to hit the road along with several city commissioners that have become too comfortable in those seats.

The only thing that prevents Grand Rapids from becoming Madison is the fact that these rubes don’t have the keys to all of the city. We have a City Manager that takes care of many of the city functions.

In full agreement. They have been around too long and they dont just tilt to the left, they are the left. Even our “republican” mayor is a leftie in many ways.

Tommy Branns biggest mistake was endorsing the SilverLine. All I do is look in my rear view mirror when on S Division making sure cop doesnt come by and write me up for just driving in the lib lane. Total waste of money

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.