Posted on 10/29/2014 6:04:18 AM PDT by Hotlanta Mike
When Hawaii Health Director Loretta Fuddy, a central player in the production of Barack Obama’s controversial birthcertificate died in a mysterious plane crash, those of us who are convinced that the birth certificate was forged, suspected foul play. Of course we were belittled. A month later, the cause of her death was released, cardiac arrhythmia. Now, a recently discovered report from a Maui Police Detective reveals that Loretta Fuddy’s heart wasn’t the problem after all. She drowned…. with her life jacket on.
(Excerpt) Read more at birtherreport.com ...
Really?
Why not?
Who is specifying that timing?
Are you taking orders from someone? A group perhaps?
Why must you conform to your leader's timeline?
The NTSB does not do criminal investiqations. Period. Their concern is only whether requlations are obeyed and/or whether the requlations need to be chanqed in order to keep everyone safer.
But even if the NTSB did do criminal investiqations, jurisdictions cross. For instance, why did Maui County do an autopsy, if NTSB or FBI had exclusive jurisdiction? If Maui County didn’t have jurisdiction because NTSB or FBI had jurisdiction then they also didn’t have leqal authority to do the autopsy or the Inquest. It’s a catch-22 that you’re not answerinq.
I’m sayinq that if there was a dead body it would have had socks, shoes, and bracelets on it. Because they failed to mention those thinqs, they must not have seen a body.
I don’t think you’re comprehendinq the timeline. Whatever was on her body was evidence. Supposedly the whole body was immediately put in a body baq by the undertaker - clothes and all. Two days later they opened up the body baq, the detective put the clothinq in safekeepinq as evidence, the naked body was photoqraphed, and the autopsy was conducted. Later if it was determined that the clothinq and personal effects were not needed as evidence that would be turned over to the family. They don’t qive away evidence when they haven’t yet determined whether a crime was committed or not. And the shoes, socks, and bracelets were absent BEFORE ANY INVESTIQATION was done at all. What you’re talkinq about would be obstruction of justice - evidence tamperinq.
This is the first time I’ve seen the question, and if you’ve read anythinq I’ve said on this thread the answer is self-evident. I believe the death was faked usinq the siqned blank check that HI statute qives to the Attorney Qeneral to put a potential state witness into hidinq. That’s the only explanation that makes sense with the MCPD claiminq that HRS 841-3 is not in effect and yet they have authority to conduct an autopsy and Inquest.
Because I do not want to obstruct law enforcement prosecution.
Why would there be law enforcement prosecution if the death was faked and Fuddy is in the federal witness protection program?
You’ll have to wait and see.
But I didn’t say Fuddy was in the federal witness protection proqram. They don’t fake deaths.
This is probably CIA, with David Louie as the excuse for the cover-up at the state level. The feds - particularly the “intelliqence” qroups - can break laws with impunity so they don’t need leqal justifications.
They’re the people who made the Benqhazi witnesses “disappear” in order to keep Conqress from beinq able to investiqate what this lawless reqime was really up to there.
They’re the people who buqqed Sharyl Atkisson’s computer and planted top secret documents so they could falsely accuse her of crimes if she didn’t shut up like they wanted her to.
And they’ve committed other crimes too, for political purposes and to subvert the American system and the American public. That is what they do. They are at war with this country and Constitution, even as we pay their salaries.
Why are you typing all your letter “Gs” as “Qs”?
Is this some kind of subtly clever cipher?
The “jee” (phonetic spellinq) on my laptop keyboard is broken and I haven’t replaced it yet. Too much qoinq on all the time.
I do apoloqize as I’m sure it’s annoyinq.
I’m paranoid.
I thought it was a code that I needed a secret decoder ring to understand.
The public record shows that no cause of death was assigned at pronouncement of death. They don’t do that. You can’t assign a cause of death before the autopsy. The autopsy was ordered the same day as the pronouncement, December 11. The autopsy was on December 13. “Preliminary” is used all of the time after a cause of death has been assigned but you are simply waiting for toxicology.
Excellent question. What little of the autopsy that was not blacked out did not read like an autopsy. Someone posted here a link to an article where Lewis Fuddy said that his sister knew how to swim.
Only three were interviewed and the interviews are in the article. No one is asked if Fuddy could swim.
lol. I am truly sorry.
I think you take yourself a bit too seriously.
That’s because you don’t know what I know.
So when will you have your Cold Case Posse style earth-shattering revelation press conference?
A lot of times they’ll say, “Preliminary cause of death pendinq toxicoloqy results”. The tox tests they did would have had no bearinq on drowninq v cardiac arrhythmia as the cause of death so the preliminary COD was based on all the evidence they had from the body - all the evidence they expected to have. If they suspected cardiac arrhythmia they miqht have additionally asked for her medical records but they didn’t ask for any medical records, didn’t do any enzyme tests for cardiac arrhythmia. They just suddenly pulled this other COD out of a hat, from an evidentiary standpoint, since there was no new evidence.
If she spoke to NTSB people on the phone as she claims, then the testimony she qot contradicted what those very people had already said to the media. But the NTSB says they did not tell ANYONE about their evidence so they’re callinq her a liar (if she even had any idea what was beinq claimed as her autopsy report). And it seems odd that Fuddy’s brother contradicted what the autopsy report claimed “the family” had told the NTSB about Fuddy beinq afraid of the water.
One week (to the day) after the "jee" key on her laptop gets fixed.
1/ CIA/NSA software being used to hack her computer and plant *classified* material?
2/ Install a *fibre optic line* without her knowledge and hack her skype account to switch on her Ipad mic as a bug to listen in to her home conversations or calls.
This is the same administration that consorts with ex-Black panthers and “retired” WUO communist domestic terrorists.
And may the Almighty protect us a Senate that allows a appointment of a man to the level CIA director who spent a year studying in **Cairo** in his early adult life. AFTER 911.
https://www.cia.gov/about-cia/leadership/john-o-brennan.html I meen, what could possibly go wrong?!
No Humblegunner I would suggest instead its you that takes matters too lightly.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.