Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: marktwain

“This situation culminated when Quilon, who had begun watching pornography on Richardson’s computer, stated that he wanted to have sex with Richardson’s wife. Richardson ordered Quilon to gather his belongings and leave. Quilon refused and walked out to a shed behind the home where Richard kept axes and other tools that could be used as weapons. Richardson then armed himself with a pistol. As Quilon returned from the shed, he approached Richardson in a threatening manner, with one arm concealed behind his back. Richardson attempted to stop him by warning him not to come any closer, and by firing a warning shot into the ground, but Quilon kept coming toward him, so Richardson shot Quilon in the stomach.

¶ 5. Richardson called 911 and informed the dispatcher that he had shot a man named Rudy Quilon in his back yard. Richardson stated that Quilon had come at him in a threatening manner and “kept coming towards me,” and that “I told him don’t come towards me any more.” He told the dispatcher that he had fired one warning shot at the ground, which Quilon ignored, and that Quilon had said “don’t do that, I’ll take care of you.” Expert testimony established that Richardson shot Quilon at close range, “somewhere in the range of 30 inches from the end of the barrel to the man’s skin where the bullet went in.”

- See more at: http://caselaw.findlaw.com/ms-supreme-court/1671261.html#sthash.Sb0hCelx.dpuf


7 posted on 10/19/2014 10:38:35 AM PDT by Mr Rogers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Mr Rogers

Also,

“CONCLUSION

¶ 24. The State incorrectly argued that Quilon’s violent criminal history was precluded by Rule 609—a rule that applies only to impeachment of witnesses. The trial judge committed reversible error by refusing to allow Richardson to defend himself with evidence that tended to show his state of mind at the time of the killing. This evidence was crucial to Richardson’s claim of self defense. We therefore must reverse Richardson’s conviction and remand for a new trial.”


8 posted on 10/19/2014 10:40:26 AM PDT by Mr Rogers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Mr Rogers
Expert testimony established that Richardson shot Quilon at close range, “somewhere in the range of 30 inches from the end of the barrel to the man’s skin where the bullet went in.”

he was very lucky...a rule of thumb if someone is physically charging you is 20 feet...the attacker got within 30 inches....WAY too close...should have been dead when he hit the 30 inch mark.

12 posted on 10/19/2014 1:31:08 PM PDT by terycarl (common sense prevails over all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson