To: frog in a pot
A strict judicial scrutiny of any such attempt seems entirely appropriate. Unless it's Eric Holder whose applying the "strict scrutiny."
11 posted on
10/15/2014 7:58:01 AM PDT by
WXRGina
(The Founding Fathers would be shooting by now.)
To: frog in a pot
That should read, “... who’s applying...” not, “whose applying...” DUH. Proof reading is our friend.
12 posted on
10/15/2014 8:09:42 AM PDT by
WXRGina
(The Founding Fathers would be shooting by now.)
To: WXRGina
Unless it's Eric Holder whose applying the "strict scrutiny". True.
Unbelievably, the survival of our 2dA promise/guarantee is currently subject to a knife edge 5/4 balance. Holder may be willing to take a substantial cut in pay to sit on the USSC just for that.
13 posted on
10/15/2014 8:49:46 AM PDT by
frog in a pot
(We are all in the same pot.)
To: WXRGina
Unless it's Eric Holder whose applying the "strict scrutiny. An absolutely nonsensical statement, that shows your ignorance of the law and legal precedent. I'm not even a lawyer, and I know better than this.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson