Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: blam
Also explain why this same approach, which was so successful in Louisiana, should not be done in Alabama. Explain also why Missouri just made a similar change to its Constitution.

Bama Carry and the Alabama Sheriff's Association are both opposed to this, which means somebody doesn't get it.

7 posted on 10/09/2014 4:04:15 PM PDT by backwoods-engineer (Blog: www.BackwoodsEngineer.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: backwoods-engineer

Strict scrutiny means that a law must have a compelling state interest for its existnce, and the law must be narrowly tailored.
McDonald and Heller both won with SCOTUS using the strict scrutiny analysis.
It has effectively tied the the hands of Chicago, mandating shall issue, and is giving DC problems.

In a perfect world, it wouldn’t be needed. But, it is a good tool under the current political realities.


12 posted on 10/09/2014 4:22:04 PM PDT by Sasparilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: backwoods-engineer
Bama Carry and the Alabama Sheriff's Association are both opposed to this, which means somebody doesn't get it.

Yep, I don't trust Alabama Sheriff's Ass but love BamaCarry. Seems the other large Alabama gun group (AGR) is for the amendment, but they (Big George sellout) didn't support the amendment last year that would of gave the right to carry in cars.

25 posted on 10/09/2014 4:41:28 PM PDT by LowOiL ("Abomination" sure sounds like "ObamaNation" to me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson