‘So stop asking me to show something I never said.’
Liar. I heaver asked you to show something you never said.
Here is your Scott quote:
“There was at least one biographical piece done on Stanley Ann where the author went and spoke with persons who knew about her relationship with Obama, Jr. So the sort of testimony you appear to be seeking is out there.”
“[chuckling sounds] Just as I suspected, if I left it vague, you’d grab for the wrong branch, showing you don’t know the topic as well as you pretend.
Nope. It wasn’t Maraniss. The piece I was referring to was Janny Scott’s A Singular Woman.”
The $ quote:
“There was at least one biographical piece done on Stanley Ann where the author went and spoke with persons who knew about her relationship with Obama”
Having identified the author who “went and spoke with persons who knew about [SA’s] relationship with Obama [Sr]...you LIED. Those quotes are not in Scott’s book.
Stop adding one lie on top of another, and cite the quotes.
Or admit you are a LIAR.
You have. I've answered to that point multiple times now (and I can even give you the specific post numbers). Move on.
But we both know you're still desperately trying to avoid answering to my main substantive point. I've been remiss in not adding this to my last few posts. The "How many times can Fantasywriter evade a question" counter slowed a bit. So here it is:
"Now, clearly, you are getting frustrated that I keep posting this:
Now, that bit of further smokescreen cleared yet again, back to my primary point so I can click the "Avoidance Counter" one more time: The FACT remains that Hawaii verifying Obama's Hawaiian birth moots your entire line of inquiry as to who did or who didn't see Stanley Ann pregnant. And it moots your inquiry into what home or homes Stanley Ann resided before or after the delivery. Because the FACT remains (despite your utter silence on this point) that in this country we prove the facts of birth by getting the relevant state to certify those fact, NOT by chasing down pregnancy witnesses or grabbing photos of "birth homes."
At some point, even you will have to contend with these FACTS.
And this:
"(See how easy it is to document having said something when one has ACTUALLY said it? So why is it you can't identify by number the post you claim provided your answer to my points about the Hawaii verifications and the FF&C clause? It's because you NEVER ANSWERED and lied claiming you had.)"
One can only wonder how you think you're making some point when you so assiduously avoid answer to the other's side primary argument?