I’m sure that it is really ok with most of the Left. They don’t seem too upset about it. And somehow it will be “different” since their side is running the show.
No he has not.
GWB was actually trying to win.
Obama is full of shit.
Political hacks... Maybe our candidates should stop holding back and call the left what they are.
Ugly rhetoric hasn’t seemed to hurt any of the Democrat politicians. At least the ugly things we can say about the left are true.
With all due disrespect, Buraq Hussein is no George W. Bush
but Obama has a peace prize (snark)
Too bad the MSM is not trumpeting it.
Love him or hate him, George Bush loved America and it’s military. You can not compare the lowlife that hates AMERICA, all it stands for and the men and women that serve to defend her to Bush in any way.
no war for polling points
Well, ISIS now has Saddam’s WMD and is using them. Someone somewhere must think that’s a threat.
While I’ll agree that George W. Bush wasn’t a perfect, Constitution-respecting president, what Obama has morphed into, imo, is the demonized stereotype of Bush created by the corrupt Democrats in cahoots with the corrupt media. Psalms 35:7-8 comes to mind.
Obama couldn’t shine G.W.Bush’s shoes.No matter what you may think about W’s economic or Foriegn policy.He was always pro-America.Unlike the Commie S.O.B.presently occupying the White House.
Hell, I am upset as a conservative that we have another George Bush running this country.
BO was a state senator back then...
GWB's goal wasn't a worldwide caliphate.
This is 0bama using the Bill Clinton, “Let’s bomb this so they stop talking about that”, option.
He is the “Commander in War Chief”
I wonder how far down this will push his approval rating...
Big surprise, Big Government “liberals” like war, aerial bombardment, World Order (the title of Kissinger’s new book, another big surprise), being Globocop, etc. Doesn’t anyone remember FDR, LBJ, etc.? War is the health of the state. Despite what we spit at eachother in pastime politics, Democrats aren’t peaceniks anymore than Republicans are racists who want to roll granny off a cliff.
Apart maybe from Mcgovern, there hasn’t been a real alternative since the Republican party nominated Willkie, of all people, an interventionist virtually indistinguishable from FDR in foreign policy, amidst the largest antiwar movement in U.S. history. It’s possible bipartisan imperialism goes all the way back to the taming of William Jennings Bryan, I’m not sure. Certainly since WWII no man has been or could be elected president without assenting to it.
Obama’s world peace tour and gimme Nobel Prize were a sham, as we all knew, though perhaps for a different reason. I doubt it, but it’s possible they have dirt on him like people think they have dirt on Roberts. I wouldn’t put it past them.