Posted on 09/19/2014 7:23:47 PM PDT by massmike
Why not all say we are gay and show up at the Gay meetings and take over the movement?
Not become really Gay.
Not Gay for real I mean....what happens behind closed bathroom stalls stays there, right?
Just say we are Gay, you know....it is not like being 100% black or Latvian...which are pretty easy things to check out.
Just show up and say....”I am Gay and I want to stay!”
It would be soooo easy to do it as a team. You say I am Gay, I vouch for you, and we are sooooo in. Deal!
Or since people are born Gay.....no really, don’t laugh, the media says they are born Gay....so that has to be true right?...why not claim that an ancestor was Gay and therefore you have the Gay gene?
Gay, but not a practicing Gay, you know. Gay lite.
Kinda like being born Jewish, but not going to Temple.
So the real question is, in order to claim Gay privilege do you have to be 1/4th Gay? Meaning one grandparent was Gay. Or maybe even 1/8th like with some Indian tribes?
Hey! Cool idea! We could just say that our grandmother was a Pawnee or Pequot, or Whatnot Indian AND Gay. Just like a Gay Elizabeth Warren, right?
Hey this is really cool....I am a Gay Whatnot Indian. Now where are all those set aside government contracts as double reparations?
If I wear my mom’s panties....I could claim Transgender privilege and get TRIPLE reparations. Hmmmm, maybe that is just Cross-dresserism, not Transgenderism...we would need a court ruling. I would get breast enlargements to maintain the con, but I ain’t getting my johnson bobbed.
I am just trying to figure how many of my ancestors I have to throw under the Gay bus to claim “Gay privilege” without doing Gay stuff or dressing all girly myself.
Uh-Oh. My mom is yelling so I got to go.
Why are we jumping through the gay hoops for a group that is made up of 1-2% of the population?
As a friend of mine said “Homosexuals recruit new members” and this is an example of their being bold in their recruitment plan
I used to watch it but only for “Absolutely Fabulous”
Patsy and Edina are a hoot
WHY is how they have sex SO important?? In learning history or science or whatever, I do not remember references made about whether a significant contributor was married, single, childless, etc. Their ACCOMPLISHMENTS were what mattered, not the details of their personal lives.
Force-feeding this crap is right out of the Communist handbook.
It’s never, ever just the tip.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.