My apologies, unfortunately your information is lost on me. I concede any legal arguments to you, because I’m unqualified to comment about specific law.
However, I’m old enough to know that legal arguments maybe contingent, incomplete, leading, subject to peer review, ambiguous or overruled by succeeding rulings, new laws or amendments to the constitution, public pressure, new evidence, non enforcement and probably a lot of things, of which, I am simply ignorant. Therefor, I have no idea, if what you said or say is true. I would be more inclined to have trust in thorough, televised congressional investigations.
Many, like myself who do not have legal backgrounds are interested in the facts regarding the incredible background of Barack Obama. His childhood mentors, family friends, his Reverend. Whether he wrote his own auto-biography as he claims, if he was a foreign student, if he registered with the selective service, or conspired to defraud the electorate, or committed treason, etc.
In other words, I hope that my representatives in congress address these concerns, or I will conclude; they are complicit in suppressing the rights of the electorate to have accurate information and a full vetting of our elected officials.
Over the last six years there have been more than 200 original jurisdiction court rulings on Obama’s eligibility, there have also been close to 100 state and federal appellate rulings and there have been 25 denied appeals to SCOTUS. No court ruling has found him to be ineligible.
Congress voted unanimously to certify Obama’s electors in January, 2009 and again in January, 2013. The 12th Amendment to the Constitution states that whoever receives a majority of the votes of the electors “shall be the president.” Obviously the clock runs out on challenging a candidate’s or a President-Elect’s credentials BEFORE the certification of the electoral vote.
Since 2009, Congress has sent Obama hundreds of bills to sign into law (as recently as this week’s continuing resolution on appropriations) and the Senate has confirmed hundreds of Obama appointees including 280 federal judges, many of whom have been confirmed unanimously. In my humble opinion, nearly six years in is a bit late to challenge eligibility.
While the issues concerning Obama’s past that you listed and are concerned about are interesting, they have little relevance at this point in time to his eligibility. He can’t run for another term and he already received 332 electoral votes.
Over the last six years there have been more than 200 original jurisdiction court rulings on Obama’s eligibility, there have also been close to 100 state and federal appellate rulings and there have been 25 denied appeals to SCOTUS. No court ruling has found him to be ineligible.
Congress voted unanimously to certify Obama’s electors in January, 2009 and again in January, 2013. The 12th Amendment to the Constitution states that whoever receives a majority of the votes of the electors “shall be the president.” Obviously the clock runs out on challenging a candidate’s or a President-Elect’s credentials BEFORE the certification of the electoral vote.
Since 2009, Congress has sent Obama hundreds of bills to sign into law (as recently as this week’s continuing resolution on appropriations) and the Senate has confirmed hundreds of Obama appointees including 280 federal judges, many of whom have been confirmed unanimously. In my humble opinion, nearly six years in is a bit late to challenge eligibility.
While the issues concerning Obama’s past that you listed and are concerned about are interesting, they have little relevance at this point in time to his eligibility. He can’t run for another term and he already received 332 electoral votes.