Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cowardly Congress Authorizes Obama to Pay Others to Fight
Charting Course ^ | 9/19/14 | Steve Berman

Posted on 09/19/2014 5:24:10 AM PDT by lifeofgrace

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

1 posted on 09/19/2014 5:24:10 AM PDT by lifeofgrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: lifeofgrace

Prediction: This will come back to haunt the US many fold.


2 posted on 09/19/2014 5:30:03 AM PDT by Mouton (The insurrection laws perpetuate what we have for a government now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lifeofgrace

So, once again, the people we will be fighting two years from now will be people we trained, fighting with weapons we gave them. Brilliant.


3 posted on 09/19/2014 5:30:33 AM PDT by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lifeofgrace

Like we paid Solyndra to make solar panels?


4 posted on 09/19/2014 5:32:29 AM PDT by tacticalogic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lifeofgrace

So is he suggesting that we do nothing or that we send the army in and invade Syria?


5 posted on 09/19/2014 5:34:58 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lifeofgrace

Prediction: they won’t fight ISIS, and we will be effectively arming ISIS.


6 posted on 09/19/2014 5:35:20 AM PDT by Darksheare (Try my coffee! First one's free..... Even robots will kill for it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lifeofgrace

What if the newly armed ‘rebels’ turn and use their weapons against Assad instead of ISIS? Or they join up with ISIS? Or surrender to or are defeated by ISIS? What happens to the weapons? We have fools in DC and GOP just voted for Zero’s loser objectives. Rolled again by Bamster.


7 posted on 09/19/2014 5:35:31 AM PDT by tflabo (Truth or tyranny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mouton
It's been established in Libya, Egypt, Syria and Iraq etc that it is not a good idea to arm, train, and finance rebels to fight globalist wars. They've got ideas of their own.

So Obama was given permission to arm,train, and finance rebels we can't be sure of? How's that going to work when the ones we were sure of, like ISIS, have created such a mess? They didn't even grow brains and decide to work with Assad and his military toward a common goal.

8 posted on 09/19/2014 5:39:52 AM PDT by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: lifeofgrace

Why is this framed as ‘paying others to fight for us’?

This is not our fight so no one would be ‘fighting for us, in our place’.

Nor should we be there in person with our own troops fighting Assad ... or whomever the current person or group is that we are supposed to be fighting ... it seems very flexible and arbitrary at best.


9 posted on 09/19/2014 5:46:33 AM PDT by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mouton

I couldn’t agree with you more. That we will financing the large scale murder and injury of our troops and quite possibly many dozens of people here in the US absolutely sickens me.


10 posted on 09/19/2014 5:52:01 AM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder (At no time was the Obama administration aware of what the Obama administration was doing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: lifeofgrace
Cowardly authorizes not very indirectly arming ISIS with more modern weapons and training.
11 posted on 09/19/2014 6:11:41 AM PDT by arthurus (Read Hazlitt's Economics In One Lesson ONLINE http://steshaw.org/economics-in-one-lesson/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: circlecity

More like a few weeks or days.


12 posted on 09/19/2014 6:12:11 AM PDT by arthurus (Read Hazlitt's Economics In One Lesson ONLINE http://steshaw.org/economics-in-one-lesson/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: grania
Obama was given permission to arm,train, and finance rebels we can't be sure of

The Sultan in Washington is sure of them. He knows where the aid is going. He needs to offset the desultory air attacks he was forced to make on his friends.

Things get strange when a great nation chooses someone from among its enemies to be its ruler.

13 posted on 09/19/2014 6:15:16 AM PDT by arthurus (Read Hazlitt's Economics In One Lesson ONLINE http://steshaw.org/economics-in-one-lesson/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: lifeofgrace

Cowardly Congress authorizes not very indirectly arming ISIS with more modern weapons and training.


14 posted on 09/19/2014 6:16:23 AM PDT by arthurus (Read Hazlitt's Economics In One Lesson ONLINE http://steshaw.org/economics-in-one-lesson/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: lifeofgrace
What could possibly go wrong??


15 posted on 09/19/2014 6:17:15 AM PDT by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg
So is he suggesting that we do nothing or that we send the army in and invade Syria?

Either of those two options would be orders of magnitude better than what we are doing. It would not take a full-scale invasion of Syria to degrade and disarm ISIS.

Taking back the oilfields in Iraq (with existing Kurd regiments) would be a good start. Finding ISIS money-making operations and destroying them, along with weapons caches is another step. Neither of those means "full scale invasion". But I don't see us doing it so never mind.
16 posted on 09/19/2014 6:19:18 AM PDT by lifeofgrace (Follow me on Twitter @lifeofgrace224)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: lifeofgrace
Either of those two options would be orders of magnitude better than what we are doing. It would not take a full-scale invasion of Syria to degrade and disarm ISIS.

What would it take?

Taking back the oilfields in Iraq (with existing Kurd regiments) would be a good start.

Now I'm confused because isn't that what this guy is talking about? "Pay others to fight?" I don't have a problem with arming the Kurds and letting them take on ISIS. They seem to be the only ones with the motivation to fight and win. But the author of this peace calls that cowardly. So aren't you supporting the cowardly path?

Finding ISIS money-making operations and destroying them, along with weapons caches is another step.

You can dry up ISIS funds through the international financial community. You don't need troops on the ground to do that.

17 posted on 09/19/2014 6:24:39 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: tflabo; pas; kristinn; trooprally; IBD editorial writer; WashingtonSource; SeekAndFind; Kaslin; ...

Two days ago, Speaker “Blank Check” Boehner approved the spending of $ 500,000,000 of US Taxpayer Dollars to “train” 5,000 Syrian Muslim Rebels in Saudi Arabia for one year. IOW, another Boehner Bailout Bill to Obama.

Here are a few discussion points that were NOT mentioned by Boehner:

* Each Syrian Muslim Rebel will cost $ 100,000 to train.

* 5,000 Syrian Muslim Rebels will be removed from the battlefields in Syria to a training site in Saudi Arabia for one year.

* The removal of 5,000 Syrian Muslim Rebels will leave their families with reduced protection from attack by Syrian Army troops, for one year.

* The removal of 5,000 Syrian Muslim Rebels will leave their families with NO protection from attack by ISIS troops, for one year.

* The removal of 5,000 Syrian Muslim Rebels from the battlefields of Syria will help both the Syrian and ISIS troops to more easily take over areas controlled by the Syrian Muslim Rebels.

BTW, did anyone notice if before the US Senate approved Boehner’s Bailout Bill yesterday, did any US Senator mention that removing 5,000 Syrian Muslim Rebels from the battlefields of Syria, was in effect, “Giving aid and comfort to the ENEMY” for the period of one year?


18 posted on 09/19/2014 6:25:24 AM PDT by Graewoulf (Democrats' Obamacare Socialist Health Insur. Tax violates U.S. Constitution AND Anti-Trust Law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
Why is this framed as ‘paying others to fight for us’? This is not our fight so no one would be ‘fighting for us, in our place’.

It is our fight. We inherited this fight by leaving Iraq to fall apart. Whether you believe we should have been in Iraq or not, this fight will come to us. Should we ignore it until it hits our shores? One way or another, we will be fighting ISIS because they won't stop fighting us, and their goal is to take it to America proper, here in our own land.
19 posted on 09/19/2014 6:26:58 AM PDT by lifeofgrace (Follow me on Twitter @lifeofgrace224)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: lifeofgrace

boots on the ground means the wonderboy has now declared he is a flip-flop


20 posted on 09/19/2014 6:33:25 AM PDT by thesligoduffyflynns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson