Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Jewbacca

My preference is for the latter, personally. How two or more consenting adults choose to order their lives is none of the Governments business at any level.

Any legal concerns can be handled under existing contract and probate laws quite nicely.


17 posted on 09/15/2014 4:39:45 PM PDT by Lurker (Violence is rarely the answer. But when it is it is the only answer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: Lurker

I would prefer marriage between one man and one woman be the only “marriage” recognized, but I agree a Constitutional Amendment would be necessary for such to pass in this absurd legal climate.

Failing that, the government getting out of the marriage business is the only other option.

Marriage is a religious rite, same as a Bar Mitzvah or Baptism, and should have no more or less legal recognition to either.


37 posted on 09/16/2014 7:28:28 AM PDT by Jewbacca (The residents of Iroquois territory may not determine whether Jews may live in Jerusalem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson