Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: sitetest
I gave the reason why at the start of the thread: "An alternate view on Ted Cruz's speech at the In Defense of Christians conference."

I agree with organizers of the conference. who said earlier today: "A few politically motivated opportunists chose to divide a room that for more than 48 hours sought unity in opposing the shared threat of genocide, faced not only by our Christian brothers and sisters, but our Jewish brothers and sisters and people of all other faiths and all people of good will."

They later added: "IDC regrets that last's night's event...was briefly politicized and that some were discourteous."

125 posted on 09/11/2014 2:52:55 PM PDT by Pyro7480 (Viva Cristo Rey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies ]


To: Pyro7480
Dear Pyro7480,

If you are condemning the message of the title of this article, then, as I previously said, I withdraw my comment.

Usually, when one posts an article and disagrees with a major premise of the article, one will signal this in one way or the other.

To be clear, Sen. Cruz did NOT insult a room of persecuted Christians, but rather, honestly called out the anti-Semites.


sitetest

128 posted on 09/11/2014 3:04:04 PM PDT by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson