“At last...we now know where all the vitriol comes from against “not-Catholic Christians”!”
You have seen no vitriol from me, and you knew you had not when you wrote that. Let’s see, when a person utters a defamatory statement he knows to be false, what do we call that?
“It’s failed, former Protestants who like former smokers are the most adamant to defend their newly realized position.”
As Lenin said, “Accuse others of what you do.” I am in no way a “failed, former protestant” — I just traded up.
“How many times have former Catholics here been castigated as being guilty of the same things?”
Firstly, “castigated?” Never.
Secondly, if former Catholics are guilty of “the same things” (not sure what those are) it in no way follows that former protestants should be.
“How many times have we been reminded that, “once a Catholic, always a Catholic”?”
Show me one.
Even so, quod licit Jovi non licit bovi. Catholicism is true; where Protestantism differs from Catholicism, it is not true. Protestantism is not on the same moral footing as Catholicism.
“It’s good that the reasoning behind such assertions has been exposed and taken with a large measure of salt - as it deserves.”
Rave on, Napoleon. Your writings are utterly bereft of reason.
dsc:Show me one.
Ask and you shall receive. (courtesty ping to salvation)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/3198952/posts?page=115#115
"You are always a Catholic due to the mark of Baptism and Confirmation on your soul."
>>DSC - post 74 "Rave on, Napoleon."
>>DSC - post 62 "Your writings are completely bereft of any hint of Christian charity. That you would say something like that speaks volumes about the content of your heart.
And that's just in this thread.