[daniel1212]

I, in my old age and infirmity, misspoke. I regret my error.

That's good, but you have lot of company it seems.

While it is unfortunate, it is still not in a class with the professional liars one encounters

Be careful throwing rocks at known or anonymous liars, Rome herself made use of the works of such done in the interest of supplying what Scripture does not.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donation_of_Constantine

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pseudo-Isidorian_Decretals

http://www.christiantruth.com/articles/forgeries.html

In addition are the often misrepresentations of Luther uncritically parroted by RCs, who strangely seem to think we are like hem and follow men as popes or see him as faultless and determinative of doctrine.

[dsc]

“http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donation_of_Constantine";

I have been wondering how you came to be in possession of so much disinformation. I’ve been reading a book called “The Da Vinci Hoax,” and now I think you got a lot of your information from “The Da Vinci Code.”

I guess someone should tell you that practically everything presented as fact in that book is false.

“Luther uncritically parroted by RCs, who strangely seem to think we are like hem and follow men as popes or see him as faultless and determinative of doctrine.”

Whether you want to admit it at all, protestants today follow that man out of the church as much as the protestants of his own day.