Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Gwen Ifill's words can be interpreted any way you/she want.

What Americans saw in Ferguson is Thuggery and Lawlessness, it is not "a new civil rights movement".

If you (Gwen Ifill, as a journalist, HA!) don't seek the truth and don't call out your own profession to obscure the truth, you have no business sprouting 'insights' on new civil rights movement.

1 posted on 08/25/2014 8:27:20 AM PDT by Sir Napsalot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last
To: Sir Napsalot

They hope that there is a new civil rights movement so they can create more victims. And blacks are now being eclipsed by Hispanics and the biggest minority group. Hence, something needs to be done to put blacks on top again—maybe not in numbers, but in influence.


2 posted on 08/25/2014 8:29:59 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sir Napsalot
they're not saying, "Pass a law." They're saying, "Enforce the current ones."

Is she talking about the Immigration Law?

3 posted on 08/25/2014 8:30:36 AM PDT by Cowboy Bob (They are called "Liberals" because the word "parasite" was already taken.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sir Napsalot
These young people on the streets, these young people who've created a social media movement around Michael Brown, they're not saying, "Pass a law." They're saying, "Enforce the current ones." "Gibsmedat!"

Fixed it.

5 posted on 08/25/2014 8:31:14 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("The man who damns money obtained it dishonorably; the man who respects it earned it." --Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sir Napsalot

So she is implying Obama is not a leader!


7 posted on 08/25/2014 8:31:44 AM PDT by PghBaldy (12/14 - 930am -rampage begins... 12/15 - 1030am - Obama's advance team scouts photo-op locations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sir Napsalot

Well, it sounds like these protestors are becoming Tea Party members

they’re not saying, “Pass a law.” They’re saying, “Enforce the current ones.” Tea Party leaders have been saying this for years. Stop passing so many laws ands concentrate on the ones you already have and enforce them. A simple request.

They’re not saying, “We’re going to wait for a single, singular leader to tell us which way to go.” They’re saying, “We’re going to lead ourselves.”

And there you have the next volunteers for the Tea Party. Many are tired of waiting for a leader to come, now they want to lead themselves.

These kids don’t even know they are part of the Tea Party yet, but will very soon


8 posted on 08/25/2014 8:32:46 AM PDT by realcleanguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sir Napsalot

Americans of any color or creed do not now have nor will they ever have ANY RIGHTS which permit them to behave unlawfully.


10 posted on 08/25/2014 8:34:57 AM PDT by RoosterRedux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sir Napsalot

‘Civil Rights’ was never about ‘equality’. It always was about what blacks want as it is now.

The whole ‘equality’ thing is just how they sold it to whites...


11 posted on 08/25/2014 8:35:14 AM PDT by Altura Ct.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sir Napsalot
"We better get justice or we'll riot, loot & burn the place down!"

Oh wait. ...there's nothing left to loot & burn! ...Nevermind.

14 posted on 08/25/2014 8:39:14 AM PDT by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sir Napsalot

That's a two-way street, Gwen. Watch out what you wish for.

15 posted on 08/25/2014 8:40:35 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out for himself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sir Napsalot
they're not saying, "Pass a law." They're saying, "Enforce the current ones."

OK. Do current laws allow a cop to shoot someone who's attacking him?

16 posted on 08/25/2014 8:41:02 AM PDT by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Click The Pic To Donate

Support FR, Donate Monthly If You Can

17 posted on 08/25/2014 8:41:39 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW (The Fed Gov is not one ring to rule them all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sir Napsalot
Fifty years ago it was cops with guard dogs stopping little girls from going into school. That was the civil rights movement.

The "New Skewl" civil rights movement is who let the dogs out where a thug who assaulted a cop starts riots where fatherless 4 th generation welfare gangstas loot big screen TVs, Nike Air Jordans, hair extensions and 12 packs of forty and Mad Dog 20/20.

This is what the civil rights movement has devolved to and it is a farcical parody of the movement Dr King gave his life for. Gwen Ifill should be ashamed of herself

22 posted on 08/25/2014 8:46:04 AM PDT by rdcbn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sir Napsalot
RIGHTS?

Rights to demand, "Gibsmedat?"

I think not.

23 posted on 08/25/2014 8:48:03 AM PDT by stboz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sir Napsalot
They're not saying, "We're going to wait for a single, singular leader to tell us which way to go." They're saying, "We're going to lead ourselves."

Of course not, Gwen.

They're saying "We're gonna loot these wide-screen TV sets by ourselves, then grab some free liquor and have a party."

Clearly that's the essential nature of this "New Civil Rights Movement" that has sprung up. But please keep on fooling yourself, Gwen, so that we can continue to laugh at you.

24 posted on 08/25/2014 8:49:06 AM PDT by Zeppo ("Happy Pony is on - and I'm NOT missing Happy Pony")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sir Napsalot

What Americans saw in Ferguson is Thuggery and Lawlessness, it is not “a new civil rights movement”.


Actually, that is exactly what the “new civil rights movement” is all about. The right of thugs to commit crimes and assaults on “the Man” with impunity and riot and loot when their basic human right to criminality is infringed upon. Society has to learn to take it’s beat down stop complaining


25 posted on 08/25/2014 8:50:40 AM PDT by rdcbn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sir Napsalot

No Gwen! This is a SNIVEL Rights Movement. I don’t get to lynch a cop so I am going to snivel about it!


26 posted on 08/25/2014 8:51:07 AM PDT by missnry (The truth will set you free ... and drive liberals crazy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sir Napsalot

civil rights for thugs and uncivil looters!
judge them by their character, please, not the color of their skin


27 posted on 08/25/2014 8:51:14 AM PDT by silverleaf (Age takes a toll: Please have exact change)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sir Napsalot

And there is something which we can’t miss in what feels different to me than Trayvon Martin, it feels different to me than Rodney King; these are all situations in which justice was questioned.

__________________________________________________
The case is only at the Grand Jury stage so the courts or ‘justice system’ that set off the Trayvon or Rodney King reaction are not even yet involved. Honestly I haven’t a clue what she is talking about.


31 posted on 08/25/2014 8:57:06 AM PDT by erlayman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sir Napsalot
what America saw in Ferguson is thuggery and lawlessness

What America also saw in Ferguson is race baiters and the media jumping to a conclusion that has no basis in reality. The logical outcome of what the screamers are asking for would be blacks policing themselves.

How's that working for Africa?

What I saw in Ferguson is the strongest possible affirmation that policemen SHOULD do their jobs and should not be condemned before the facts are known. I've never felt so strongly about the need for law and order and not short circuiting or pre-guessing the judicial process.

33 posted on 08/25/2014 8:59:35 AM PDT by grania (THE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sir Napsalot

Gwen is a special combination of ignorant and stupid.

The long term outcome of Ferguson is going to hinge on whether the physical evidence and ballistics show Brown was charging Wilson at the time the fatal shots were fired.

Gwen is betting against that. Given how little of that part has made it into the public sphere she probably isn’t even aware of it. Or how stupid of a bet she’s making.

It’s very similar to Trademark: where the narrative was undemined and made irrelevant by the fact that he was beating Zimmerman’s head into the ground when Zimmerman pulled the trigger.

If anything Gwen (and a lot of other people) should be scared of the bet they’re making: if the underlying facts of their narrative don’t play out as expected they either skink away with reduced credibility OR the double down on a very inflammatory and inciteful lie ... with predictable results.


34 posted on 08/25/2014 9:00:31 AM PDT by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson