Posted on 08/10/2014 8:06:44 AM PDT by IChing
Mitt Romneys job in 2012 was simply to block other Republican candidates from winning the nomination....Thats the only reason he ran in the first place.
That is why conservatives MUST come together on one nominee or getting The Conservative Party in every state.
What!? Really??!
You first. Romney backer or Being paid by the RNC.
Anyone would have a better chance of winning! If you haven’t noticed, Romney didn’t bother to show up to the election the last time. What on earth makes you think that a second non-run would be any better?
Bottom line, many have written extensively on Ronald Reagan’s own “socialist” aspects and defaults, as a governor of California and even as president. Seems like too many in our party crush a raisin cookie under their heel because it isn’t chocolate chip, then wind up dining for 8 years on a steady diet of steaming communist Obama dog scat.
I asked first.
It’s an insult to even suggest Romney is anything close to Reagan.
Besides, you can read, can’t you?
That's what people said about Romney at about this time in 2011.
Ponder now the deja vu in 2016 of 2012, because there's a pretty good chance it's headed our way. When we're looking at it in 2016, anyone who expresses surprise is ... irritating at best.
Prepare now to be looking at a "choice" between Romney and the Democrat nightmare, because that is very probably what it is going to be. I know how and why I will vote, and it will be again for a different party. The Republican party is the diet decaf version of the Democrat party. That is what makes it "conservative." And I say, to hell with that. I know in my bones that there are a whole lot of Americans -- most, in fact -- who essentially think the same way I do about it.
It isn't the candidate, it's the agenda. Republicans and Democrats have an agenda to grow government. My vote will go elsewhere.
How easily we forget.
Bump.
You do know that he only appoints liberals to the courts.
Really? So why not just call Cruz a caveman with paleolithic under pinnings and well, irrelevant?
Please, tell us what Romney stands for...what he really stands for?
He had zero new ideas and argues not for change but, a “realistic management” of what exists.
Management of what exists? There are plenty of managers around.
We want a leader.
Yep.
LOL!!!
Oh damn. Just damn.
I had plenty of crazy thoughts about your posit.
I’d ride lightning for sure if I said em....
Kinda like sleeping with a really obese girl:
“You just don’t know”.
LOL!
Romney whipped socialized medicine on Massachusetts. Then helped Obama change it to socialized medicine for the whole country. Best case scenario Romney is nothing more than a competent version of Obama. I ain’t voting for him.
The person who helped Obama win was Romney by deciding he did not have to run against him. Romney stayed home, so Romney lost.
Blaming people for Romney’s failing is ridiculous. Imagining doing the exact same thing again and getting a different result is insane. If Romney runs again, he will lose again.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.