Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: faithhopecharity
NATO is a defensive alliance and only for the defense of Europe (and USA). NATO is not authorized to support aggressive projections of military forces like this.

Any ida how that matches up with the NATO adventurism into Libya just prior to Kadaffi's forced, and violent, exit?

24 posted on 07/29/2014 8:51:52 AM PDT by RobinOfKingston (Democrats--the party of Evil. Republicans--the party of Stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: RobinOfKingston

you’ve put your finger on the problem

Obama was able to commandeer NATO and use its colors for his (mostly USA) bombing of Libya (to replace its government with a more violent IslamoNazi variety of thugs)

and so it goes. But whether Obama could get away with mis-using NATO again, is questionable. (I guess we will see...).


25 posted on 07/29/2014 9:09:07 AM PDT by faithhopecharity ((Brilliant, Profound Tag Line Goes Here, just as soon as I can think of one..))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson