Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: norwaypinesavage

You are confusing cost and price. The price is what it is because US patent law gives them exclusive use of their intellectual property which allows them to recoup the cost. But other countries don’t. So the price is low. That doesn’t make the same drug produced elsewhere inferior.


41 posted on 07/25/2014 7:24:15 PM PDT by Hugin ("Do yourself a favor--first thing, get a firearm!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]


To: Hugin
"You are confusing cost and price."

You are the one who is confused. The cost of drugs is not simply the production cost. The production cost of most drugs is essentially zero. It is negligible compared with the cost of approving new drugs for sale. The price must also allow recovery of all of the costs associated with the drug development. You are simply discussing the production costs.

A complicating factor is the fact that the patent must be issued long before the drugs are approved for sale. This leaves far less time for the development costs to be amortized before the patent runs out. Longer patent protection times would actually REDUCE the consumer price of the drugs.

49 posted on 07/26/2014 3:39:46 AM PDT by norwaypinesavage (The Stone Age didnÂ’t end because we ran out of stones)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson