Posted on 07/25/2014 1:38:26 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
Its shocking how 1.6 percent of the population Im speaking of LGBTers are controlling our culture. Years ago they told is over and over again that a persons choice in sex partners shouldnt matter.
Now it seems thats all that matters. Michael Sam feels compelled to tell the world that he has sex with other men, and he and his fellow-LGBTers demand that we accept his choice in sex partners or else. While Sam said that everyone is entitled to their own opinions, thats not the way its working out.
Its gotten so bad that a person cant express an opinion on the subject without being assaulted through numerous media channels.
Voting your conscience on same-sex marriage, as the CEO of Mozilla did when Proposition 8 was up for a vote in California and passed with a majority of votes, got him canned from the company he founded.
Keep in mind that where a man sticks his penis is not the same as being born with black skin. There are all types of sexual behaviors that are considered abnormal and criminal. Some people have positive opinions about them and most have negative opinions. Once immoral and irrational sexual behavior like same-sex sexuality has been defined down, other sexual taboos have fallen with it.
Its already happening with pedophilia, polyandry, incest, and polygamy.
How many times have you heard LGBTers argue that love should not be forbidden? I dont know anybody who wants to forbid or outlaw love. I love a lot of people. But the LBGT issue isnt about love; its about legitimizing certain types of sexual behaviors, relationships, and transitions (transgenders).
Any contrary opinion can lead to dire legal complications. Laws are being used against people that Michael Sam says should be entitled to their opinions.
Weve seen it with the baker who is being forced to acknowledge the legitimacy of same-sex marriages in a state where its Constitution does not recognize same-sex weddings. How is that right? Some made-up governing body in the state of Colorado is requiring him and his staff to undergo (im)moral and irrational retraining.
Then theres Bob Eschliman, a veteran news editor, who was fired for criticizing a pro-homosexual bible titled the Queen James Bible.
The following is from George Orwells 1984. It describes those who have adopted the position that same-sex sexuality is rational and anybody who refuses to say so will be reprogrammed:
You are a slow learner, Winston."
"How can I help it? How can I help but see what is in front of my eyes? Two and two are four."
"Sometimes, Winston. Sometimes they are five. Sometimes they are three. Sometimes they are all of them at once. You must try harder. It is not easy to become sane.
This brings me to the latest from the world of liberal toleration and freedom of thought. Its something right out of 1984.
Josh Barro, writing in the New York Times, demonstrates that Orwells warming not only wasnt heeded, but there are people who have adopted the tactics of Big Brother and view them as morally normative if the cause is their own. For them, 1984 is an instruction manual.
Barro tweeted the following as reported by Owen Strachan:
Anti-LGBT attitudes are terrible for people in all sorts of communities. They
linger and oppress, and we need to stamp them out, ruthlessly.
Remind you of anything?
If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face forever.
Thats also from 1984.
Erick Erickson of Red State wrote a brief response to Barros tweet, to which Barro replied that he thinks that we should make anti-LGBT views shameful like segregation. Not saying we should off people.
Orwell didnt mean by the stomping boot analogy that people should be killed if they did not comply, although some might be for the good of the cause. The point being made was that every means possible (not just permissible) will be taken to ensure compliance. Thats what the LGBTers are trying to do.
Its time that people like Tony Dungy stop apologizing for their opinions.
Yes it is. I've seen it expressed that sodomy is inherently totalitarian becase a man cannot give himself to another man, the way a woman can. As a result the dominant homo must "overcome" the natural inclination of the other male to not be "dominated". At a certain level, sodomy is rape.
Hence, as you said, the natural inclination for the homo crowd is to dominate, i.e be Nazis.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.