Which one of the Dionne Quints was EJ?
Did she get her diaper changed often enough?
Yes. It IS activism. This article ignores a fundamental tenant of judicial review ... simply put, you ignore typos. You read the Statute in it’s entirety. You defer to the Executive branches interpretation.
These are such fundamental tenants that a Con Law student gets it. This is not me talking or supporting ODimwit Care, this is just basic. SO basic. SO easy.
Now while I would love to see ODimwit Care take a well deserved bath, these judges did us NO favors. It is such a ridiculous decision that what does it do? Motivate the Dims.
No. You don’t interpret a law exactly as written. You interpret a law so it makes sense. The way it is interpreted by the 4th Cir panel makes no sense. It’s a “gotcha” analysis.
Anyway, I’m as unhappy with the law as anyone, but as they say ... with friends like these ...
I prefer to think that for an instant it has showed some moral clarity, for change.
“Daffy Duck” Dionne is a radical nut. He is uninformed, unreasonable and unintelligible.
That would be pretty much every article EJ Dionne has ever written.
Traitor Roberts still rewrote the law all by his self.
That’s funny. I didn’t see any articles by EJ Dionne whining about judicial activism when it comes to gay marriage.
“The best way to get a bad law repealed is to enforce it strictly.” ~ Abraham Lincoln
“By effectively gutting the Affordable Care Act on Tuesday, two members of a three-judge panel on the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals showed how far right-leaning jurists have strayed from such impartiality.”
Oh, so when the decision goes in YOUR favor THEN it’s impartial................got it.
What an asshat.