Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: driftdiver
If there are no protections for the production of intellectual property, whether it is a movie or novel or medicine or software or an engine design or a hybridized seed, there will not be investment in innovation.

Patents aren't forever. For medicines, they are barely seven years.

Most unique new seed varieties are not GMOs. That's another difficulty in arguing with the anti-GMO crowd; they won't understand that hybrids and GMOs are very different things.

78 posted on 07/19/2014 12:37:48 PM PDT by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]


To: Mamzelle

Well said.

Even GMOs have stark differences. Given the variety of natural items that go into a human diet, we’re crunching up all manner of DNA. Transgenic from plant to plant hardly seems like gambling.


80 posted on 07/19/2014 12:44:29 PM PDT by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]

To: Mamzelle

Yes I have no problem with most hybrids.

GMO is another story. I work with some leading genetic researchers in the cancer field. they admit they don’t know what a good portion of our DNA does. Nobody knows the DNA of plants and how mixing genes will impact humans.

As for protection of intellectual property. Thats fine protect your seeds. If you allow your plant to impact another property owner then you should lose control over your property and not gain control over theirs.


83 posted on 07/19/2014 2:16:37 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson