Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: ReaganÃœberAlles

It would be impossible to distinguish that situation. You’d have to come up with another category—”shoulda been a hit.” Very subjective. As I said, that’s why no-hitters involve a whole lot of luck, and not getting a no-hitter often involves a lot of bad luck. But it could be an objective standard to award a perfect game to a pitcher who gets everyone out, and one of his fielders makes an error. However, I am not about to try to change baseball tradition for this one anomaly. I’m just sayin’.


32 posted on 06/19/2014 10:17:37 AM PDT by Defiant (Obama is not the anti-Christ. He is Satan's John the Baptist, preparing the way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: Defiant

Understood and it’s too bad it depends on what a fielder might do but perfect is perfect. Nobody may reach base. Just strike everybody out. lol But then you’re still relyin on the catcher not screwin things up.


33 posted on 06/19/2014 2:06:25 PM PDT by ReaganÜberAlles (Remember, you can't spell "progressive" without "SS".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson