Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I will say Right Wing News doesn’t like World Net Daily. he doesn’t mention them, but Red Flag News add them at number 4 or 5. It depends whether you agree with them on some issues if you like them or not or if you like the fact Michael Savage writes and comments for them and uses it as his news site on his own homepage.

Dana Loesch, The Blaze TV host, said once she hated WND on radio. But I find I have read very interesting articles on different subjects on their and I am free to agree or disagree. They are no different than the rest except they talk sometimes about stuff some of the conservative media doesn’t.

On the other hand. I have no need for Red State. I have enough sites to go to to read info. I also don’t like that Right Scoop, which otherwise is a good site, only cares about Mark Levin. They don’t focus on other radio shows only clips and clips of Levin. So I skip all the Levin posts because I feel he gets free promotion on their. And the people in charge hate the other radio hosts.


16 posted on 04/30/2014 1:23:00 PM PDT by Mozilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Mozilla
I'd put WND in the conservative column. They were pioneers of alternative media.

Many people probably don't remember, but WND was the organization that fought for and won the right to be an accredited news service at the White House. At the time, the newsies all banded together and only allowed themselves (the networks, the newspapers, and news mags) to be accredited to cover the White House and Congress.

At first, they declined to admit WND into the press rooms. WND fought and won.

WorldNetDaily locked out of Washington press corps: Joseph Farah slams government media-cabal

The Senate's Star Chamber: Joseph Farah updates readers on accreditation fight with news police

WND banned from covering Capitol (Paul Sperry)

Galley Gatekeepers - The Politics of Press Credentials

Prior to the credentials fight, WND was at the forefront of reporting on Clinton White House shenanigans. Paul Sperry was their top investigative reporter at the time. Sperry reported on how Clinton purposely downgraded the telephone systems at the West Wing in order to hide calls going to/from specific telephones.

Sperry also reported on missing White House emails of Al Gore, and how the entire email archive process was tainted.

But the highlight of WND reporting was the 2000 series on the Gore family in Tennessee, which resulted in Tennessee voting for George Bush. If Gore had won his home state, the Florida fiasco would never have happened.

WorldNetDaily's investigations into Clinton and Gore gave us the George Bush presidency.

-PJ

44 posted on 04/30/2014 2:26:47 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson