You really are stretching here to try and salvage your ignorant argument. For big schools, bad season’s impact is minimal, if at all. Texas just had their best reveune season and yet, one of their very disappointing seasons on the field - so much so they fired a coach who won them a National Title.
Thus, it’s the largeness of Texas and the inherent support of Texas that dictates revenues - hardly anything to do with the current coaches or players.
Game, set, match to me……thanks for playing, drive safely.
Not stretching at all. Just pointing out that things that change revenue. The fact that Texas fired their coach shows how important winning is to the bottom line. And the booster complaints with the new hire show the importance of keeping them engaged. If they were confident that performance on the field wouldn’t impact the bottom line then they keep the old guy, but with 4 disappointing seasons in a row things had to change.
Sorry the facts YOU present show the fallacy of your argument. And your need to declare victory and throw insults shows you know your argument is weak.