Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: discostu
Football is expensive to put on and support. At most you get six or eight home games a season and for the outdoor version you need a facility that seats 10s of thousands. TV is what makes the NFL profitable, not so much ticket sales. There have been numerous other leagues and NFL Europe was bankrolled by the NFL and even that was not sustainable. A minor league system makes no sense.

People also forget that until the 60s... college football was much bigger than the pros in terms of national interest. The real tradition of football is in college, not so much pro, football. College lets the players showcase and develop their skills against the best for everyone to see and evaluate. No need for a minor league.
49 posted on 03/27/2014 9:58:50 AM PDT by Fry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]


To: Fry

There are two big gains with a minor league system. The first is the teams’ ability to have players taught the way they want them taught without taking up roster spots on the main team. You don’t worry if trying to season the player is dragging the team down because they’re on the farm team any winning the farm team does is just icing.

The second is it presents an opportunity to experiment with the game without risking annoying your main audience. The NHL does this all the time, most rules changes have been tried out for at least part of a season in the minors, and a lot of the things they try out there they don’t like the results and back them out. Sometimes even mid season which is something you just can’t get away with in the big money league.

I don’t know if these benefits make a need, but they could make a lot of things go smoother. Look at the recent debate in the NFL on extra points, all of the solutions presented are major changes that Goodell has basically admitted they’re afraid to adopt because they don’t want to commit a whole season to a new rule that might actually be worse. If they had a real minor league that’s a solvable problem. Also look at draft busts, a lot of the discussion around Tebow is people saying he should have gotten more chances, but his completion percentage shows there was a definite cost to giving him more chances, with a farm team he could have gotten a couple of seasons to be taught the NFL game without anybody worrying he was costing the team any games. There’s a constant discussion in the QB position on how different the college and pro games are and how few star college QBs have been given any of the training pro coaches want their QBs to have.

But somebody’s gotta pay for it. And I don’t see the NFL as ever deciding to foot the entire bill for a league they know nobody will watch. If they were willing to do that NFLE would still exist.


50 posted on 03/27/2014 10:15:52 AM PDT by discostu (Call it collect, call it direct, call it TODAY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

To: Fry

If they require the universities to pay their football players, get ready for the Title IX crowd to come in and insist on equal pay for an equal number of female athletes, who play sports that draw hardly any ticket sales. That will make the whole system totally unworkable, financially.

Frankly I don’t see a thing wrong with the current system. If a student athlete thinks he is being taken advantage of, just receiving a free education, he is free to quit.


51 posted on 03/27/2014 10:25:05 AM PDT by Avid Coug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson